<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hawk Wings &#187; survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/tag/survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A third of bloggers consider themselves journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One in three bloggers regard their work as journalism according to a new study from the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Although Apple has now dropped its law suit against Think Secret et al., one of the key issues was whether bloggers are journalists and enjoy the same rights as more traditional media. Pew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/wp-images/blogging.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="10" align="right" alt="blogging" title="blogging" />One in three bloggers regard their work as journalism according to a new study from the Pew Internet and American Life Project.</p>
<p>Although Apple has now dropped its law suit against Think Secret et al., one of the key issues was whether bloggers are journalists and enjoy the same rights as more traditional media.</p>
<p>Pew Internet&#8217;s ambitious study which covers the demographics, motivation, activity, audience and technology of bloggers found that most bloggers write to be creative or express themselves. (Apparently journalists don&#8217;t do this).</p>
<p>Only a minority engaged in what the survey called &#8220;journalistic activities&#8221;:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/wp-images/bloggersjournalists.jpg" height="328" width="430" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="10" alt="bloggersjournalists" title="bloggersjournalists" /></div>
<p>Oddly, several important journalistic activities are missing. On the one hand there&#8217;s nothing about a thirst for the truth or a commitment to the public interest. On the other, no mention of a knack for pounding out product placements as if they were reviews, taking care not to upset companies that advertise in the same enterprise and writing whatever the editor serves up whether they know anything about it or not.</p>
<p>It is unfortunate that the survey is not very reliable. While the survey concludes that 12 million people in the USA maintain a blog, it only conducted telephone interviews with 233 of them and the self-declared margin of error is +/- 7%.   </p>
<p>It also seems untroubled by <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/30/bloggers-thieves-hacks-or-journalists/">the semantic can of worms</a> opened up by words like blogger and journalist open up. </p>
<p>Still, if you are interested in the snapshot of bloggers that the survey offers, you can <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP%20Bloggers%20Report%20July%2019%202006.pdf">download a 33 page PDF summary</a>  <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> of its findings. <tags>blogging, bloggers, survey, journalists, demographics</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/30/bloggers-thieves-hacks-or-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="30 May 2006, 12:36 am">Bloggers: Thieves, hacks or journalists?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/24/web-20-hype-is-all-fluff-and-hot-air/" rel="bookmark" title="24 June 2006, 10:35 pm">Web 2.0 hype is all fluff and hot air?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/08/the-strange-history-of-it-company-names/" rel="bookmark" title="8 March 2006, 12:49 am">The strange history of IT company names</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/" rel="bookmark" title="11 April 2006, 12:33 am">British survey of online etiquette</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2010/07/02/apple-mails-market-share-increases-by-21/" rel="bookmark" title="2 July 2010, 10:38 am">Apple Mail&#8217;s market share increases by 21%</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.669 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 hype is all fluff and hot air?</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/24/web-20-hype-is-all-fluff-and-hot-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/24/web-20-hype-is-all-fluff-and-hot-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not apple mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/24/web-20-hype-is-all-fluff-and-hot-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web 2.0 sites like Flickr are massively over-hyped in a way that greatly distorts real usage patterns, according to a survey conducted by HitWise this week.Although Flickr seems to be on the lips of every high-impact blogger, the survey of photo-sharing sites concluded that Flickr ranks only sixth (5.95%) by market share (hits), a long way behind sites like Photobucket (43%) and Yahoo!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/wp-images/flickr.jpg" height="38" width="108" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="flickr" title="flickr" />Web 2.0 sites like Flickr are massively over-hyped out of all proportion to real usage patterns, according to a survey conducted by HitWise this week.</p>
<p>Although Flickr seems to be on the lips of every high-impact blogger, the survey of photo-sharing sites <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/leeann-prescott/2006/06/photobucket_leads_photo_sharin.html">concluded</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that Flickr ranks only sixth (5.95%) by market share (hits), a long way behind sites like Photobucket (43%) and Yahoo! Photos (18.3%):</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/wp-images/photosites.jpg" height="272" width="331" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0" alt="photosites" title="photosites" /></div>
<p>Why is this so?  Much comment revolves around a perceived social hierarchy among bloggers. The Register, who claims that mainstream media aggravates the situation by only listening to blogging royalty, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/23/pictures_sharing_web_skew/">prints</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> the following opinion:</p>
<blockquote><p>Photobucket is all over Myspace and LiveJournal, and it gets the hits, but the San Francisco myopia only sees their web 2.0 darlings.</p></blockquote>
<p>HitWise analyst Leann Prescott suggests that the results reflect the cultural habits of the hoi polloi at LiveJournal and MySpace: </p>
<blockquote><p>Photobucket, Slide, and Imageshack are all image hosting sites, and MySpace is their primary source of traffic. In fact, MySpace was responsible for 76% of Slide&#8217;s traffic in May 2006, 56% of Photobucket&#8217;s traffic, and 50% of Imageshack&#8217;s traffic. The growth of Photobucket and Slide go hand in hand the growth of consumer generated content and social networking sites&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Demonstrating exactly the elitism (or intelligence, depending on your point of view) under examination, Marshall Kilpatrick at TechCrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/22/photobucket-vs-flickr-in-alexa-and-technorati/#comment-81345">agrees</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that the aristocrats and bloggerati may be out of touch, but says it&#8217;s all in a good cause:</p>
<blockquote><p>High-authority bloggers appear to write about Flickr about 3 times as often as they (we) write about Photobucket. The blogosphere as a whole uses the word Photobucket 3 or more times as often as we use the word Flickr. (TechCrunch has used the word Flickr 11 times more often than the word Photobucket.) Does that mean high-authority bloggers are out of touch with the bulk of users? It may; it may also mean that being interesting doesnâ€™t equate with mass adoption.</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems an odd debate to me.  First, &#8220;hype&#8221; is obviously about what&#8217;s coming not about what is.  If everyone was using Web 2.0 services like flickr, the hype would be about Web 3.0.</p>
<p>Secondly, hits are a very crude measure of importance.  They only tell me what people are visiting. They tell me nothing qualitative, nothing about how interesting, useful, stimulating, innovative (or not) the destination is, only how popular it is.<tags>flickr, web 2.0, blogging, internet culture, hitwise, survey, not apple mail</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/15/is-gmail-better-than-sex/" rel="bookmark" title="15 September 2005, 11:32 am">Is Gmail better than sex?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="25 July 2006, 1:31 am">A third of bloggers consider themselves journalists</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/08/more-rumours-of-the-death-of-email/" rel="bookmark" title="8 November 2007, 10:30 pm">More Rumours of the Death of Email</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/26/hawk-wings-gets-leaner-and-meaner/" rel="bookmark" title="26 April 2006, 8:36 pm">Hawk Wings gets leaner and meaner</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/08/07/what-bird-is-that/" rel="bookmark" title="7 August 2005, 12:48 am">What bird is that?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 11.511 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/24/web-20-hype-is-all-fluff-and-hot-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

