<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hawk Wings &#187; plain English</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/tag/plain-english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Journalism: Impenetrable technowaffle</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/computer-journalism-impenetrable-technowaffle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/computer-journalism-impenetrable-technowaffle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not apple mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain English]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/computer-journalism-impenetrable-technowaffle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this time of year in my day job, I have to supervise exams.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/wp-images/jargonfreewriting.jpg" height="132" width="180" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="jargonfreewriting" title="jargonfreewriting" />At this time of year in my day job, I have to supervise exams. </p>
<p>Today, while making sure with one eye that my students weren&#8217;t cheating in their Greek exam, with the other eye I read <em>Writing Good English</em> by Tony Kleu, a subeditor at the <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em>.  </p>
<p>A section in the chapter on jargon and waffle deserves a wider audience:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/wp-images/screenshot-72.jpeg" height="27" width="30" border="0" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="openquotationmarks" title="openquotationmarks" />Jargon is sometimes unfairly dismissed as bad English&#8230;. What is bad is the inappropriate use of jargon in speech or text directed at a non-specialist audience&#8230;. Newspapers and magazines are full of it, sadly, especially in their computer pages. </p>
<p>Writers familiar with the jargon of the computer industry regularly fail to translate it into standard English for their readers. Instead of explaining, they parrot words they saw in an industry press release, leaving the poor readers to make sense of impenetrable techowaffle.</p>
<p>A typical recent example was the phrase &#8220;form factor&#8221;, meaning size. That phrase doesn&#8217;t save any space. It actually requires yet another word, an adjective, before it acquires any value:</p>
<blockquote><p>This computer offers blinding speed and generous memory in a <strong>compact form factor.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>The writer meant</p>
<blockquote><p>This small computer is very fast and has a big memory.</p></blockquote>
<p>It gets worse:</p>
<blockquote><p>The HP Compaq nc4200 notebook PC simplifies the on-the-go mobile professional experience by packing mainstream computing features into an <strong>ultra-thin lightweight form factor</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Setting aside the question of what a mobile professional experience is (a doctor doing house calls, maybe?) the writer meant it was small <strong>and</strong> light. But isn&#8217;t that something that we already expect in a notebook PC? The writer might as well have said:</p>
<blockquote><p>The HP Compaq nc4200 notebook PC has all the features you&#8217;d expect from a powerful desktop computer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes, it seems as if the writer is deliberately showing off, as if to tell his audience <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/wp-images/screenshot1-33.jpeg" height="26" width="30" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="closequotationmarks" title="closequotationmarks" /> &#8220;You&#8217;re thick; you don&#8217;t even know what this means.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps I notice this more than I should, being a writer who is interested in geek things rather than a geek who likes to write. In any case, this hits the nail on the head, I reckon.<tags>journalism, jargon, computer writing, IT, plain English, form factor, not apple mail</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/14/nice-email-from-apple-mail-team-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="14 February 2006, 9:22 am">Nice email from Apple, Mail team jobs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/" rel="bookmark" title="4 May 2006, 10:29 pm">Email first, think later: A practical demonstration</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/03/how-google-promotes-bad-writing/" rel="bookmark" title="3 March 2006, 1:58 am">How Google promotes bad writing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/23/mac-imap-mail-as-information-manager/" rel="bookmark" title="23 March 2006, 1:16 am">.Mac IMAP mail as information manager</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/23/hawk-wings-blogger-gets-real-job/" rel="bookmark" title="23 May 2006, 12:27 am">Hawk Wings blogger gets real job!</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 48.193 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/computer-journalism-impenetrable-technowaffle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

