<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hawk Wings &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has confirmed that its premier email client, Outlook, will remain non-compliant with web standards in the next version of MS Office due out in 2010. The statement comes in response to a campaign launched by the Email Standards Project , asking Microsoft to provide Outlook with text rendering that complies with web standards (like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/outlook-2007logo.jpg" alt="Outlook 2007logo"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="127" width="130"/>Microsoft has confirmed that its premier email client, Outlook, will remain non-compliant with web standards in the next version of MS Office due out in 2010.</p>
<p>The statement comes in response to <a href="http://fixoutlook.org./" title="Outlook&rsquo;s broken&mdash;Let&rsquo;s fix it">a campaign launched by the Email Standards Project</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>, asking Microsoft to provide Outlook with text rendering that complies with web standards (like almost every other major email client on the market &#8212; see <a href="http://www.email-standards.org/clients/" title="Email Client Reports | Email Standards Project">a list of them</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>), and to reverse the decision made in Office 2007 to use Word&#8217;s text engine rather than an HTML-compliant editor to compose emails.</p>
<p>MS Word does not provide support for key elements of CSS design tags like float, margin, padding, background-image and many more.  You can quickly get a sense of the problem by looking at this image of an email displayed by Outlook 2000 and 2007:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/outlook-2000-2007.jpg" alt="Outlook 2000 2007" height="319" width="450"/></div>
<p>In a post on <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/24/the-power-of-word-in-outlook.aspx" title="Microsoft Office Outlook Team Blog : The Power of Word in Outlook">the Outlook Team Blog</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>, the Corporate Vice President of Microsoft&#8217;s Office Communications and Forms Team William Kennedy says that,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;while we don’t yet have a broadly-available beta version of Microsoft Office 2010, we can confirm that Outlook 2010 does use Word 2010 for composing and displaying e-mail, just as it did in Office 2007. We’ve made the decision to continue to use Word for creating e-mail messages because we believe it’s the best e-mail authoring experience around, with rich tools that our Word customers have enjoyed for over 25 years. Our customers enjoy using a familiar and powerful tool for creating e-mail, just as they do for creating documents.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, a lack of web standards is not the only problem Outlook causes for Mail.app users, perhaps not even the main one. </p>
<p>The Campaign to fix Outlook is not giving up.  You can read more about it <a href="http://fixoutlook.org./" title="Outlook&rsquo;s broken&mdash;Let&rsquo;s fix it">on its web site</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> or, if you twitter, <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Uncool.+%40msofficeus+is+using+Word+to+render+emails+in+Outlook%2C+killing+standards+support.+See+http%3A%2F%2Ffixoutlook.org+and+RT" title="">make your compliant known</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that way.<tags>mail.app, apple mail, web standards, html, outlook, microsoft, office</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/24/outlook-2007-beta-2-screenshots-commentary/" rel="bookmark" title="24 May 2006, 8:43 am">Outlook 2007 beta 2: screenshots, commentary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/16/outlook-2007s-html-rendering-stuff-up/" rel="bookmark" title="16 January 2007, 11:55 pm">Outlook 2007&#8242;s HTML rendering stuff-up</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/11/entourage-to-get-spotlight-isync-support/" rel="bookmark" title="11 January 2006, 10:02 am">Entourage to get Spotlight and iSync support</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/23/speed-up-pasting-in-word-with-scripts/" rel="bookmark" title="23 January 2008, 8:55 pm">Speed up pasting in Word with scripts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/02/office12s-tutti-frutti-interface-design/" rel="bookmark" title="2 March 2006, 12:39 am">Office 12&#8242;s tutti-frutti interface design</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.698 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTTPMail updated for 10.5.3</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail Plug-ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple mail leopard mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hotmail plugin HTTPMail has been updated to work with 10.5.3. This plugin won&#8217;t work with all Hotmail accounts, only older ones. But in a clever move it tells you whether it works or not. Either it does, or it gives an error message saying that the account needs to be updated to Hotmail Plus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/httpmail.jpg" alt="Httpmail"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="107" width="107"/>The Hotmail plugin HTTPMail has been updated to work with 10.5.3.</p>
<p>This plugin won&#8217;t work with all Hotmail accounts, only older ones.  But in a clever move it tells you whether it works or not.  Either it does, or it gives an error message saying that the account needs to be updated to Hotmail Plus (in which case, see <a href="http://mail.google.com/" title="">Gmail</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>) </p>
<p>From the FAQ and readme notes included in the disk image, it seems that there are currently two kinds of Hotmail accounts, pre-WebDAV ones (really old), WebDAV ones (less old). I think I read somewhere that 2004 is the magic date.</p>
<p>In any event, as Hawk Wings readers know, <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/" title="Reprieve: Hotmail for Mail.app not (quite) dead | Hawk Wings">all Hotmail accounts will soon</a> (but not as soon as 30 June) become DeltaSync accounts.  </p>
<p>In the meantime, if your Hotmail account is old enough, this may be the solution for you.  </p>
<p>I could only find an older version, 1.49, on <a href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=74709" title="SourceForge.net: Files">the plugin&#8217;s sourceforge page</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.  The most recent one is available <a href="http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10842/httpmail-plugin" title="httpmail plugin 1.52 - MacUpdate">from MacUpdate</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> though. </p>
<p>[I should confess that I don't have a Hotmail account and--in breach of the usual Hawk Wings policy--haven't tested this for myself.]<tags>hotmail, microsoft, plugins, httpmail, mail.app, apple mail leopard mail, gmail</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="15 November 2007, 11:06 pm">HTTPMail returns for Leopard: Hotmail in Mail</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="15 June 2008, 11:23 pm">The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/24/webmail-plugins-for-mailapp-the-current-state-of-play/" rel="bookmark" title="24 October 2006, 10:06 pm">Webmail plugins for Mail.app: The current state of play</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/11/httpmail-plugin-149-finally-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="11 August 2006, 12:27 am">httpmail 1.49: Hotmail plugin finally universal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/21/hotmail-mailapp-and-intel-macs/" rel="bookmark" title="21 April 2006, 12:25 am">Hotmail, mail.app and Intel Macs</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.711 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reprieve: Hotmail for Mail.app not (quite) dead</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macfreepops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebDav]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, who would have thought? News of Hotmail&#8217;s death for mail.app users is exaggerated. Microsoft has relented and deferred the transition from WebDAV to its own DeltaSync standard. This means that Mail.app users with HTTPMail and MacFreePOPs plugins won&#8217;t be cut off on 30 June after all. After listening to customer feedback from the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hotmail-logo.jpg" alt="Hotmail Logo"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="60" width="204"/>Well, who would have thought?  <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/" title="The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution | Hawk Wings">News of Hotmail&#8217;s death</a> for mail.app users is exaggerated.</p>
<p>Microsoft has relented and deferred the transition from WebDAV to its own DeltaSync standard. This means that Mail.app users with HTTPMail and MacFreePOPs plugins won&#8217;t be cut off on 30 June after all.</p>
<p>After listening to customer feedback from the original accouncement, Microsoft <a href="http://emailsupport.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!5D6F5A79A79B6708!5745.entry" title="Windows Live Hotmail Technical Support Blog&#58; Responding to Customer Feedback &#8211; Disabling DAV">told its users</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> &#8220;it became clear that you needed additional time to evaluate alternative solutions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Still, this only postpones the executioner&#8217;s axe.  Don&#8217;t fritter away all the extra time Microsoft has given you in making a decision.</p>
<p>With apologies for any distress.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://blog.fastmail.fm/2008/06/17/hotmail-access-via-pop-links-update/" title="Hotmail access via Pop Links update &laquo; FastMail.FM Weblog">The Fastmail.fm Weblog</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>] <tags> Apple Mail, fastmail, GMAIL, hotmail, httpmail, macfreepops, mail.app, microsoft, webmail, webdav</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="15 June 2008, 11:23 pm">The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/" rel="bookmark" title="20 June 2008, 9:52 pm">HTTPMail updated for 10.5.3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="15 November 2007, 11:06 pm">HTTPMail returns for Leopard: Hotmail in Mail</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/12/09/httpmail-147a/" rel="bookmark" title="9 December 2005, 7:17 am">httpmail 1.47a</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/15/http-mail-plugin-broken-after-1043-update/" rel="bookmark" title="15 November 2005, 10:32 pm">http-mail plugin broken after 10.4.3 update?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.373 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desperate measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[izymail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macfreepops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wevdav]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Not quite as bad as it sounds &#8212; See later post. In April Microsoft announced that it would be terminating WebDAV access to its Hotmail accounts at the end of June this year and replacing it with a proprietary service of Microsoft&#8217;s own creation (DeltaSync). This is bad news for Mail.app users with Hotmail [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hotmail.jpg" alt="Hotmail"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="37" width="120"/><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Not quite as bad as it sounds &#8212; <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/">See later post</a>.</p>
<p>In April Microsoft <a href="http://emailsupport.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!5D6F5A79A79B6708!5359.entry" title="Windows Live Hotmail Technical Support Blog&#58; Microsoft Announces Changes for Accessing Hotmail with Outlook Express">announced</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that it would be terminating WebDAV access to its Hotmail accounts at the end of June this year and replacing it with a proprietary service of Microsoft&#8217;s own creation (DeltaSync).</p>
<p>This is bad news for Mail.app users with Hotmail accounts, who have been using utilities like <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/" title="HTTPMail returns for Leopard: Hotmail in Mail | Hawk Wings">HTTPMail</a> and <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/06/macfreepops-23-webmail-plugin-gets-leopardised/" title="MacFreePOPs 2.3: Webmail plugin gets leopardised | Hawk Wings">MacFreePOPs</a> to access their email.  After 30 June, they won&#8217;t work. (There are reports that 10.5.3 has broken HTTPMail for some users, merely hastening the inevitable). </p>
<p>For those unwilling to let go their Hotmail email address, another solution beckons.  While the plugins might not work any more, a web-based service is offering the same function.</p>
<p><a href="http://v3.izymail.com/default.aspx" title="IzyMail - WebMail in your Inbox">IzyMail</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>, so it claims, &#8220;enables you to access webmail from major providers such as AOL, Yahoo, MSN, Hotmail, Windows Live, Fastmail or Gmail with any eMail application&#8221;. It even has <a href="http://v3.izymail.com/iPhoneSettings.aspx" title="IzyMail - iPhone Mail Settings for Webmail like Hotmail, MSN, Live.com">a special page</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> on setting up Hotmail on the iPhone.</p>
<p>It provides users with incoming and outcoming servers that can be plugged into Mail.app&#8217;s Accounts preferences. IzyMail does the heavy-lifting behind the scenes, and delivers fresh Hotmail into your Inbox via POP.</p>
<p>It offers free accounts (with some limitations) and a paid option (c. USD 18/year):</p>
<div align=center><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/izymailaccounts.jpg" alt="Izymailaccounts" height="347" width="450"/></div>
<p>Or perhaps it&#8217;s time to take another look at Gmail. <tags>microsoft, hotmail, httpmail, macfreepops, wevdav, webmail, izymail, mail.app, apple mail, gmail, fastmail, yahoo, aol, desperate measures</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/14/reading-hotmail-and-yahoo-email-in-thunderbird/" rel="bookmark" title="14 August 2006, 11:39 pm">Reading Hotmail and Yahoo! email in Thunderbird</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/21/hotmail-mailapp-and-intel-macs/" rel="bookmark" title="21 April 2006, 12:25 am">Hotmail, mail.app and Intel Macs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/24/webmail-plugins-for-mailapp-the-current-state-of-play/" rel="bookmark" title="24 October 2006, 10:06 pm">Webmail plugins for Mail.app: The current state of play</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="17 June 2008, 9:46 pm">Reprieve: Hotmail for Mail.app not (quite) dead</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/25/mail-forward-311b1-read-your-webmail-in-mailapp/" rel="bookmark" title="25 April 2006, 7:47 am">Mail Forward 3.1.1.b1: Reading your webmail in Mail.app</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.748 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacWorld&#8217;s review of Entourage 2008: A missed opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/macworlds-review-of-entourage-2008-a-missed-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/macworlds-review-of-entourage-2008-a-missed-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Address Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entourage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office for mac 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/macworlds-review-of-entourage-2008-a-missed-opportunity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Negrino at MacWorldhas written a review of Entourage 2008, part of the newly released Microsoft Office for Mac 2008. Although it has its fans, the shortcomings of Entourage 2004 were well-known and many were hoping for greater things from Entourage 2008. MacWorld&#8217;s verdict? There are several other new or improved features relating to e-mail [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/entourage_2008.jpg" alt="Entourage 2008"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="106" width="113"/>Tom Negrino at MacWorld<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/131563/2008/01/entourage2008.html" title="Macworld | Microsoft Entourage 2008">has written a review</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>  of Entourage 2008, part of the newly released Microsoft Office for Mac 2008.</p>
<p>Although <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/30/how-the-new-entourage-kicks-mails-butt/" title="Hawk Wings  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; How the new Entourage kicks Mail&#8217;s butt">it has its fans</a>, the shortcomings of Entourage 2004 were well-known and many were hoping for greater things from Entourage 2008.</p>
<p>MacWorld&#8217;s verdict?</p>
<blockquote><p>There are several other new or improved features relating to e-mail or calendaring, but they apply only to users in corporate environments that connect to a Microsoft Exchange server. Given that it&#8217;s been four long years in the making, it&#8217;s a missed opportunity that Entourage 2008 hasn&#8217;t also added some of the best new features found in Mail, such as automatic detection of physical addresses and dates, or e-mail stationery templates. </p></blockquote>
<p>Entourage gets points for more complete AppleScript-ability, for compatibility with Mac OS X&#8217;s Services and for looking nicer, but when you get down to business &#8212; backing up your email and working with other apps &#8212; things look less rosy.</p>
<p>Negrino notes <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/macmojo/archive/2007/12/12/it-s-about-the-data.aspx" title="Mac Mojo : It's About Data">Microsoft&#8217;s advice</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that Entourage&#8217;s monolithic database be excluded from Time Machine backups and that users employ &#8220;alternative backup methods&#8221; instead. This is not only a pain in the butt, but cuts across the comprehensive design of Time Machine as a &#8220;set and forget&#8221;, everything-that-matters-to-you backup system.</p>
<p>Working with iCal is also fraught in Negrino&#8217;s view:</p>
<blockquote><p>When you first synchronize Entourage with Sync Services, it creates an Entourage calendar in iCal, replicating your Entourage events in iCal. If you add or change events in that Entourage calendar in iCal or on a mobile device, those events will be synchronized back to Entourage&#8217;s internal calendar. But there&#8217;s no way to bring events from other iCal calendars (such as the default Home, Work, or Birthdays calendars) into Entourage&#8217;s internal calendar. Put another way, Entourage can publish data to iCal, but can&#8217;t subscribe to any of iCal&#8217;s other calendars. In effect, Entourage uses iCal as a convenient conduit to synchronize its data to other devices, but doesn&#8217;t treat iCal as a full calendaring partner.</p></blockquote>
<p>After getting to the end of the review, I was surprised by the final sentence: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Finally, if you&#8217;re outside of the corporate realm, and need a mail, calendar, and contact manager with lots of headroom and solid integration with the rest of the Office suite, Entourage provides a wealth of features that are deeper than Apple&#8217;s trio.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you? <tags>entourage, microsoft, office for mac 2008, mail.app, ical, address book, sync services, time machine, email</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/14/sneak-preview-of-the-new-entourage-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="14 November 2007, 9:48 pm">Sneak preview of the new Entourage 2008</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/15/entourage-gets-spotlight-sync-services-support/" rel="bookmark" title="15 March 2006, 8:16 am">Entourage gets Spotlight, Sync Services support</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/11/01/draining-the-online-calendar-swamp/" rel="bookmark" title="1 November 2006, 11:18 pm">Draining the online calendar swamp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/12/25/ical-duplicates-script-updated-for-leopard/" rel="bookmark" title="25 December 2007, 11:49 am">iCal Duplicates Script updated for Leopard</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/an-automated-email-of-the-weeks-upcoming-events/" rel="bookmark" title="21 January 2008, 11:50 pm">An automated email of the week&#8217;s upcoming events</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.846 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/macworlds-review-of-entourage-2008-a-missed-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if Microsoft had designed Gmail?</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/21/what-if-microsoft-had-designed-gmail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/21/what-if-microsoft-had-designed-gmail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/21/what-if-microsoft-had-designed-gmail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Blogoscoped asks the question : what if Microsoft, not Google, had created Gmail? What would be the differences in that web mail client for users today? What if we apply some of the same design rules that brought us Hotmail, for instance? The answer is entertaining. Here is a teaser, but as the post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/gmail1.jpg" alt="Gmail"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="84" width="100"/>Google Blogoscoped <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-11-20-n35.html" title="What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?">asks the question</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>:</p>
<blockquote><p>what if Microsoft, not Google, had created Gmail? What would be the differences in that web mail client for users today? What if we apply some of the same design rules that brought us Hotmail, for instance?</p></blockquote>
<p>The answer is entertaining.</p>
<p>Here is a teaser, but as the post unfolds the mock-up screenshots get better and better:</p>
<div align=center><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/microsoftgmail.jpg" alt="Microsoftgmail" height="305" width="450"/></div>
<p><a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-11-20-n35.html" title="What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?">Head on over</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> and have a look for yourself. <tags>microsoft, windows live, gmail, google, interface design, humour</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/11/windows-email-clients-compared/" rel="bookmark" title="11 June 2006, 9:18 pm">Windows email clients compared</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/04/mail-forward-31/" rel="bookmark" title="4 March 2006, 1:22 am">Mail Forward 3.1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/09/coverflow-for-quicksilver/" rel="bookmark" title="9 November 2007, 12:13 am">Coverflow for Quicksilver?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/24/outlook-2007-beta-2-screenshots-commentary/" rel="bookmark" title="24 May 2006, 8:43 am">Outlook 2007 beta 2: screenshots, commentary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/27/windows-live-mail-hotmail-revamped/" rel="bookmark" title="27 January 2006, 12:24 am">Windows Live Mail: Hotmail revamped</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.375 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/21/what-if-microsoft-had-designed-gmail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTTPMail returns for Leopard: Hotmail in Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail Plug-ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Parnell has released an initial Leopard-friendly version of HTTPMail (1.50), a plugin for Mail.app that fools Hotmail and MSN web-based email accounts into downloading POP emails into Mail. It basically does the same thing as MacFreePOPs, now also released for Leopard. The plugin comes in a disk image with an installer and a detailed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/httpmail.jpg" alt="Httpmail"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="107" width="107"/>Daniel Parnell has released an initial Leopard-friendly version of HTTPMail (1.50), a plugin for Mail.app that fools Hotmail and MSN web-based email accounts into downloading POP emails into Mail.</p>
<p>It basically does the same thing as <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/06/macfreepops-23-webmail-plugin-gets-leopardised/" title="Hawk Wings  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; MacFreePOPs 2.3: Webmail plugin gets leopardised">MacFreePOPs</a>, now also released for Leopard.</p>
<p>The plugin comes in a disk image with an installer and a detailed PDF on how to use it.</p>
<p>Daniel provides a handy list of how far the Leopard development has come:</p>
<div align=center><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/httpmailworsdoesntwork.jpg" alt="Httpmailworsdoesntwork" height="395" width="450"/></div>
<p>He also outlines how to set up a Hotmail account in Mail.app using the plugin. He reminds users that older free Hotmail and MSN accounts will probably work but that newer one may need to be upgraded to <a href="http://get.live.com/mailplus/features" title="Windows Live Hotmail Plus">Hotmail Plus</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.  </p>
<p>HHTPMail is freeware and available <a href="http://www.automagic-software.com/downloads.php" title="Automagic Software Pty Ltd">from Daniel&#8217;s web site</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> (but not yet from <a href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=74709" title="SourceForge.net: Files">its sourceforge page</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>). <tags>microsoft, httpmail, hotmail, msn, plugins, mail.app, apple mail, email, leopard</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/20/httpmail-updated-for-1053/" rel="bookmark" title="20 June 2008, 9:52 pm">HTTPMail updated for 10.5.3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/24/webmail-plugins-for-mailapp-the-current-state-of-play/" rel="bookmark" title="24 October 2006, 10:06 pm">Webmail plugins for Mail.app: The current state of play</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/11/httpmail-plugin-149-finally-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="11 August 2006, 12:27 am">httpmail 1.49: Hotmail plugin finally universal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="15 June 2008, 11:23 pm">The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/21/hotmail-mailapp-and-intel-macs/" rel="bookmark" title="21 April 2006, 12:25 am">Hotmail, mail.app and Intel Macs</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.554 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/httpmail-returns-for-leopard-hotmail-in-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sneak preview of the new Entourage 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/14/sneak-preview-of-the-new-entourage-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/14/sneak-preview-of-the-new-entourage-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entourage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office for mac 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/14/sneak-preview-of-the-new-entourage-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mac Business Unit has published its fifth sneak-peak of the new Office for Mac 2008, focussing on Entourage 2008. The video demonstrates the creation of an event in Entourage&#8217;s calendar, giving a sense of appointment features familiar (colour-coding for each calendar) and unfamiliar (allowance for travelling time to and from the appointment). The new, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/officeformac_2008.jpg" alt="Officeformac 2008"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" height="39" width="150"/>The Mac Business Unit has published its fifth sneak-peak of the new Office for Mac 2008, focussing on Entourage 2008.</p>
<p>The video demonstrates the creation of an event in Entourage&#8217;s calendar, giving a sense of appointment features familiar (colour-coding for each calendar) and unfamiliar (allowance for travelling time to and from the appointment).</p>
<div align=center><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/entourage_2008calendar.jpg" alt="Entourage 2008calendar" height="253" width="450"/></div>
<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/entourage_2008myday.jpg" alt="Entourage 2008myday"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" height="277" width="200"/>The new, previously-seen &#8220;My Day&#8221; Desktop interface for Entourage also gets a good work out.  You get to see the creation of a to-do, the reordering of to-dos and other bits and pieces.</p>
<p>Since I am feeling grumpy with Leopard iCal at the moment (although not as grumpy as Pierre Igot at Betalogue who today rightly <a href="http://www.betalogue.com/2007/11/13/ical-30-apple-ignores-keyboard-users-again/" title="Betalogue  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; iCal 3.0: Apple ignores keyboard users again">unloads on iCal&#8217;s lack of keyboard support</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>), it all looks pretty attractive.</p>
<p>It pains me a bit to say it, but here is something that looks like it works. And gives users some control over how to manage their to-dos and events and edit them easily. Of course, it may be a different story when we actually have the app in our hands. </p>
<p>See the sneak-peak for yourself below or <a href="http://www.macoffice2008.com/#en_ie" title="Microsoft Office for Mac 2008">on the Office:Mac 2008 web site</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PMTQN3QE06A&#038;rel=1&#038;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PMTQN3QE06A&#038;rel=1&#038;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><tags>microsoft, office for mac 2008, entourage, ical, mail.app, apple mail, switching, productivity, email, MBU</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/macworlds-review-of-entourage-2008-a-missed-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="21 January 2008, 11:01 pm">MacWorld&#8217;s review of Entourage 2008: A missed opportunity</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/20/mailapp-vs-the-new-entourage/" rel="bookmark" title="20 March 2006, 12:05 am">Mail.app vs the &#8220;new&#8221; Entourage</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/15/entourage-gets-spotlight-sync-services-support/" rel="bookmark" title="15 March 2006, 8:16 am">Entourage gets Spotlight, Sync Services support</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/11/26/spanning-syncs-ical-google-calendar-sync-app/" rel="bookmark" title="26 November 2006, 9:26 pm">Inside Spanning Sync&#8217;s iCal-Google Calendar sync beta</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/20/quickcal-plain-language-ical-widget/" rel="bookmark" title="20 June 2009, 7:56 am">QuickCal: plain language iCal Widget</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.463 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/14/sneak-preview-of-the-new-entourage-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Outlook to Mail.app with libpst</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/14/from-outlook-to-mailapp-with-libpst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/14/from-outlook-to-mailapp-with-libpst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pst files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/14/from-outlook-to-mailapp-with-libpst/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Tan at Tan Tan Noodles has written up a way to switch from Outlook to Mail.app using the open source utility, libpst , which was originally developed for Linux but runs fine on Mac OSX. There are already a number of tried and true ways to crack open Outlook&#8217;s PST files and make the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/outlook.jpg" alt="Outlook"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" height="120" width="120"/>Joe Tan at Tan Tan Noodles <a href="http://tantannoodles.com/2007/02/12/random-tip-importing-emails-from-outlook-into-a-mac/">has written up a way</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> to switch from Outlook to Mail.app using the open source utility, <a href="http://alioth.debian.org/projects/libpst/">libpst</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>, which was originally developed for Linux but runs fine on Mac OSX.</p>
<p>There are already a number of tried and true ways to crack open Outlook&#8217;s PST files and make the transition, either using <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/22/switching-from-outlook-to-apple-mail-via-mozilla/">Mozilla</a> or (for Outlook Express users) <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/11/importing-email-from-outlook-and-outlook-express/">DbxConv</a>. </p>
<p>Or you could use the shareware utility, <a href="http://www.littlemachines.com/">O2M</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> (formerly known as Outlook2Mac) which only costs USD 10.</p>
<p>Still, some people get a kick out doing this kind of thing for free, and libpst offers another way.</p>
<p>Joe outlines just twelve steps from downloading the source code, compiling (not as hard as you imagine)  and running it, to the end result.</p>
<p>If I had a PST file to hand, I&#8217;d try it myself.  Fortunately, I don&#8217;t.<tags>mail.app, apple mail, outlook, outlook express, microsoft, pst files, switching, freeware</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/11/importing-email-from-outlook-and-outlook-express/" rel="bookmark" title="11 September 2005, 10:29 pm">Importing email from Outlook and Outlook Express</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/14/importing-contacts-from-outlook-or-outlook-express/" rel="bookmark" title="14 September 2005, 11:39 pm">Importing Contacts from Outlook or Outlook Express</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/12/11/abfiller-importing-outlook-contacts-made-easy/" rel="bookmark" title="11 December 2005, 8:26 am">ABFiller: Importing Outlook Contacts made easy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/29/omic-a-plugin-to-extract-winmaildat-files/" rel="bookmark" title="29 August 2006, 11:07 pm">OMiC: A plugin to extract winmail.dat files</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/10/outlook-express-to-become-windows-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="10 October 2005, 12:12 am">Outlook Express to become &#8220;Windows Mail&#8221;</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.516 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/14/from-outlook-to-mailapp-with-libpst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC to offer Microsoft-only streaming content?</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/01/bbc-to-offer-microsoft-only-streaming-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/01/bbc-to-offer-microsoft-only-streaming-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/01/bbc-to-offer-microsoft-only-streaming-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC will shut the &#8220;minority of consumers who either do not use Microsoft or do not have an up-to-date Microsoft operating system&#8221; out of its new on-line, on-demand services, according to proposals put up for public comment by the British broadcaster. The restriction is driven by DRM concerns as the BBC outlines in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/bbc.jpg" alt="Bbc"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="5" height="90" width="120"/>The BBC will shut the &#8220;minority of consumers who either do not use Microsoft or do not have an up-to-date Microsoft operating system&#8221; out of its new on-line, on-demand services, according to <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/consult/open-consultations/ondemand_services.html">proposals put up for public comment</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> by the British broadcaster.</p>
<p>The restriction is driven by DRM concerns as the BBC outlines in <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review-report-research/pvt_iplayer/ondemandpva.pdf">a weighty (652KB) PDF</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> of its new plans. It intends to place all content on the net for seven days after the initial broadcast, so that users can &#8220;catch-up&#8221; on shows they have missed.</p>
<p>But it won&#8217;t be a free-for-all:</p>
<blockquote><p>In respect of the seven-day catch-up over the internet service, the files would require DRM to ensure that they were appropriately restricted in terms of time and geographic consumption. The only system that currently provides this security is Windows Media 10 and above. Further, the only comprehensively deployed operating system that currently supports Windows Media Player 10 and above is the Windows XP operating system. As a result of these DRM requirements the proposed BBC iPlayer download manager element therefore requires Windows Media Player 10 and Windows XP. This means the service would be unavailable to a minority of consumers who either do not use Microsoft or do not have an up-to-date Microsoft operating system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mac users (and others) will take some comfort from hopes of a less proprietary future:</p>
<blockquote><p>However, over time, technology improvements are likely to enable even more efficient methods of delivery. Further, it is our understanding the BBC Executive are working towards the iPlayer download manager being able to function on other operating systems.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you have strong views about these things or simply like your media free of proprietary constrictions, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/consult/open-consultations/ondemand_services.html">the BBC welcomes comments</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/31/brits_act_now_to_sav.html">Boing-Boing</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> -- Thanks, Conrad]</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> According to fifthdecade, who posts in the comments below,</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft are getting a 2 year exclusivity deal which they haven&#8217;t paid for. It&#8217;s a scandal! That alone must be worth millions to Microsoft if next year&#8217;s Premier League football TV coverage is worth Â£600 million!</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://fifthdecade.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/bumbling-bbc-gives-away-millions-to-microsoft-with-exclusive-2-year-viewer-lock-in/">Read more</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> on his blog.<tags>microsoft, DRM, BBC, cross-platform, media player, data security, apple, linux</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/15/the-death-of-hotmail-for-mailapp-users-and-a-new-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="15 June 2008, 11:23 pm">The Death of Hotmail for Mail.app users and a new solution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/17/reprieve-hotmail-for-mailapp-not-quite-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="17 June 2008, 9:46 pm">Reprieve: Hotmail for Mail.app not (quite) dead</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/19/set-a-default-email-client-without-mailapp/" rel="bookmark" title="19 February 2006, 12:47 am">Set a default email client without Mail.app</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/21/what-if-microsoft-had-designed-gmail/" rel="bookmark" title="21 November 2007, 1:10 am">What if Microsoft had designed Gmail?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/10/outlook-express-to-become-windows-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="10 October 2005, 12:12 am">Outlook Express to become &#8220;Windows Mail&#8221;</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.771 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/02/01/bbc-to-offer-microsoft-only-streaming-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

