<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hawk Wings &#187; IM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/tag/im/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adium Book 1.3: Universal, multiple account support</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/09/24/adium-book-13-universal-multiple-account-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/09/24/adium-book-13-universal-multiple-account-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Address Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not apple mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/09/24/adium-book-13-universal-multiple-account-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adium Book is a utility that can synchronise Adium&#8217;s contact list and your Address Book. The new version (1.3) released today is a universal binary, features some performance tweaks to improve the app&#8217;s speed and fixes some issues with Jabber accounts. It also offers support for multiple IM accounts in its Address Book view. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/adiumbook.jpg"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="Adiumbook" height="104" width="98" /><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/12/10/adium-book-sync-adium-and-address-book/">Adium Book</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> is a utility that can synchronise Adium&#8217;s contact list and your Address Book.</p>
<p>The new version (1.3) released today is a universal binary, features some performance tweaks to improve the app&#8217;s speed and fixes some issues with Jabber accounts.  It also offers support for multiple IM accounts in its Address Book view.</p>
<p>The interface has been reworked:</p>
<div align=center><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/adiumbook_13.jpg" alt="Adiumbook 13" height="379" width="450" /></div>
<p>With Adium Book you can add Adium contacts to Address Book or update the information on an Address Book card using data from Adium.</p>
<p>It allows full text search of Adium contacts and Address Book and provides a range of reports, among them a listing of contacts without pictures, contacts in Adium but not in Address Book or a listing of contacts by IM service.  </p>
<p>Adium book is donation-ware and is available from <a href="http://adiumxtras.com/index.php?a=xtras&#038;xtra_id=2069">the Adium Extra&#8217;s web site</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> or <a href="http://aureliosoft.wordpress.com/">the developer&#8217;s webs site</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.<tags>not apple mail, adium, address book, contacts, IM, chat, universal, reports, instant messaging</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/12/10/adium-book-sync-adium-and-address-book/" rel="bookmark" title="10 December 2005, 12:34 am">Adium Book: Sync Adium and Address Book</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/24/addressbookquickentry-faster-contact-entry/" rel="bookmark" title="24 January 2006, 12:32 am">AddressBookQuickEntry: Faster contact entry</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/11/address-book-reports-206/" rel="bookmark" title="11 January 2006, 12:26 am">Address Book Reports 2.0.6</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/19/printing-address-book-contacts/" rel="bookmark" title="19 May 2006, 1:28 am">Printing Address Book contacts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/08/13/export-address-book-13-vcards-groups-support/" rel="bookmark" title="13 August 2006, 1:34 am">Export Address Book 1.3: vCards, Groups support</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.589 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/09/24/adium-book-13-universal-multiple-account-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaboration and &#8220;occupational spam&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/10/collaboration-and-occupational-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/10/collaboration-and-occupational-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the death of email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/10/collaboration-and-occupational-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Information World Review, David Tebbit posts about the much-hyped "death of email".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/wp-images/emailoverload-4.jpg" height="134" width="110" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="emailoverload" title="emailoverload" />At Information World Review, David Tebbutt <a href="http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/comment/2155356/rebirth-email">posts</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> about the much-hyped &#8220;death of email&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Late last year Business Week published an article on <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_48/b3961120.htm">how email is in its death-throes</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> and Stowe Boyd later confirmed that <a href="http://www.corante.com/getreal/archives/2006/01/02/2006_prediction_2_the_killer_app_is_dead.php">it is all true</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> &#8212; email is on its last legs. </p>
<p>Tebbutt has a more nuanced view. He sees the value of wikis, IM and other collaborative tools as ways of freeing us from the avalanche of &#8220;Reply All&#8221; emails that whizz around the average office, described by Ross Mayfield of Socialtext as &#8220;occupational spam&#8221;.</p>
<p>He argues that greater use of these tools doesn&#8217;t mean the end of email. On the contrary, he says, it will free email up:</p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, email could well be heading for a renaissance as a person-to-person communication tool. Exactly what it was invented for.</p></blockquote>
<p><tags>web 2.0, collaboration, wikis, IM, blogs, email, the death of email, productivity</tags> <strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/28/microsoft-spam-problem-is-solved/" rel="bookmark" title="28 January 2006, 12:25 am">Microsoft: Spam problem is solved</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/04/reports-of-emails-death-not-greatly-exaggerated/" rel="bookmark" title="4 January 2006, 1:52 am">Reports of email&#8217;s death not greatly exaggerated?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/09/how-email-is-still-the-best-colloboration-tool/" rel="bookmark" title="9 April 2006, 11:50 pm">How email is still the best colloboration tool</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/08/junkmatcher-free-extra-spam-protection/" rel="bookmark" title="8 September 2005, 9:25 am">JunkMatcher: free extra spam protection</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2010/05/20/uk-survey-shows-death-of-email-premature/" rel="bookmark" title="20 May 2010, 10:48 pm">UK Survey proves &#8220;death of email&#8221; premature</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 41.767 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/10/collaboration-and-occupational-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British survey of online etiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British ISP ntl:Telewest has published the results of a recent survey on etiquette in email, IM and SMS communication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/email_etiquette.jpg" height="113" width="100" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="email_etiquette" title="email_etiquette" />British ISP ntl:Telewest <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/research_insights/press_room/press_campaigns/business_etiquette.html">has published the results</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> of a recent survey on etiquette in email, IM and SMS communication.</p>
<p>The survey of over 1,468 (53% male / 47% female) office workers contains few surprises, although it is interesting to compare the results with similar US studies on <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/02/how-men-and-women-use-email-differently/">email use and gender</a> and <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/26/more-technology-less-productivity/">email productivity</a>.</p>
<p>Email is the electronic medium of choice. The report found that &#8220;more people said they were addicted to email in the workplace than any other medium, with 78% of respondents claiming they couldnâ€™t live without it.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, it seems email is not always being used for work-related purposes.  UK offices are full of what the report describes as &#8220;bad behaviour&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>Professionals arenâ€™t only using email to make corporate deals. 40% use the tool for gossip, 54% for socialising, and 60% for dealing with issues regarding their relationships with coworkers. Men are more likely than women to use email for socialising, whereas women are more likely to use it for gossiping.</p></blockquote>
<p>The study asked respondents how long they needed to wait for a reply to an email before considering the recipient of the original email rude:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/UKemailresponsetimes.jpg" height="220" width="430" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="5" alt="UKemailresponsetimes" title="UKemailresponsetimes" /></div>
<p>The survey also found that younger respondents were more adventurous in their communication channels than older ones, and males more than females.  </p>
<p>In British offices, traditional communication methods remain important: &#8220;Leaving aside email for the moment, a high number of respondents rely more heavily on traditional methods of communications&#8230;. 29% use both fax and letter each day â€“ although this figure rises the older the respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally the report identified three stereotypes in British workplaces.  It&#8217;s always fun to think about which category your fellow workers fall in, so here they are:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The OAT (Old Age Technologist)</strong><br />
OATs are not necessarily old in age, but have more dated attitudes towards new communication technologies. OATs realise new technologies are becoming more prevalent in the workplace, but they&#8217;re dealing with this change by maintaining their tried and tested ways of communication. OATs are not sure how or why people have taken so readily to &#8216;new age&#8217; communications tools. </p>
<p><strong>The ESBO (Easily Sociable Behaviour Online)</strong><br />
Very comfortable when using modern communications, ESBOs are as happy text messaging their boss as IM&#8217;ing a client or taking part in a video conference. The ESBO zooms through the workday checking emails upwards of 300 times. Some ESBOs love the phone, some hate it, but the critical matter is that IM, text messaging and email have become more important than even their desks. </p>
<p><strong>The StoIC (Slow to Implement Change)</strong><br />
The SToIC follows etiquette rules and doesn&#8217;t stray from accepted comfort zones. If there isn&#8217;t a generally accepted way of using a new technology the SToIC will avoid it altogether. The SToIC is still using the fax on a regular basis and would rarely consider writing a text message for work purposes.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you are not sure which one you are, you can <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/research_insights/press_room/press_campaigns/Etiquette_quiz/bus_etiquette_quiz.html">take an online survey</a>  <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> to find out.</p>
<p>The findings of the report are available online in PDF form as an <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/documents/press_campaigns/Etiquette_summary.pdf">executive summary</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.<tags>email, productivity, etiquette, IM, SMS, communication</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/12/where-did-the-day-go/" rel="bookmark" title="12 November 2005, 6:16 pm">Where did the day go?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2010/05/20/uk-survey-shows-death-of-email-premature/" rel="bookmark" title="20 May 2010, 10:48 pm">UK Survey proves &#8220;death of email&#8221; premature</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/" rel="bookmark" title="15 April 2006, 1:10 am">Hawk Wings Easter Message</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="25 July 2006, 1:31 am">A third of bloggers consider themselves journalists</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/02/how-men-and-women-use-email-differently/" rel="bookmark" title="2 January 2006, 12:20 am">How men and women use email differently</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 11.914 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How email is still the best colloboration tool</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/09/how-email-is-still-the-best-colloboration-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/09/how-email-is-still-the-best-colloboration-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/09/how-email-is-still-the-best-colloboration-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long post on Central Desktop explains why email is still the best tool for collaboration.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/email_screen.jpg" height="88" width="100" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="email_screen" title="email_screen" />A long post on Central Desktop <a href="http://blog.centraldesktop.com/comments.php?y=06&amp;m=04&amp;entry=entry060403-214628">explains why</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> email is still the best tool for collaboration.</p>
<p>Among other things, the post points out that email is customisable and tweakable in ways that other modes of online communication are not, that it is universally available and accessible and that people understood what it is and how to use it.</p>
<p>You may remember a flurry of Internet opinion a few months ago forecasting <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/04/reports-of-emails-death-not-greatly-exaggerated/">the imminent death of email</a> and/or <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/20/email-is-so-over/">the replacement of email</a> with wikis and Instant Messaging.<tags>email, collaboration, IM, wiki, Web 2.0, internet, productivity</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/04/reports-of-emails-death-not-greatly-exaggerated/" rel="bookmark" title="4 January 2006, 1:52 am">Reports of email&#8217;s death not greatly exaggerated?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/20/email-is-so-over/" rel="bookmark" title="20 November 2005, 11:20 am">Email is&#8230; like&#8230; so over</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/10/collaboration-and-occupational-spam/" rel="bookmark" title="10 May 2006, 12:46 am">Collaboration and &#8220;occupational spam&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/03/the-good-and-the-bad-in-email/" rel="bookmark" title="3 May 2006, 10:50 pm">The Good and the Bad in Email</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2010/05/20/uk-survey-shows-death-of-email-premature/" rel="bookmark" title="20 May 2010, 10:48 pm">UK Survey proves &#8220;death of email&#8221; premature</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 41.340 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/09/how-email-is-still-the-best-colloboration-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired copy chief vents spleen over language and email</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/21/wired-copy-chief-vents-spleen-over-language-and-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/21/wired-copy-chief-vents-spleen-over-language-and-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the good old days]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/21/wired-copy-chief-vents-spleen-over-language-and-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Copy Chief at Wired News Tony Long has written an acidic attack on the role of technology in the the decline of standards in writing and punctuation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/wp-images/Johnson-1.gif" height="153" width="120" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="Johnson" title="Johnson" />The Copy Chief at Wired News Tony Long has written <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/columns/1,70214-0.html">an acidic attack</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> on the role of technology in the decline of writing standards. </p>
<p>It is technology &#8212; IM, text messaging and email &#8212; which he argues is (mostly) to blame: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;it doesn&#8217;t matter whether you are reading your local rag, surfing the net or trying to make heads or tails of someone&#8217;s inane blog &#8212; the quality bar is set lower than ever.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Whether or not you find his argument persuasive, you will enjoy the verbal imagery.</p>
<p>It runs the whole gamut from poetic (&#8220;[Email's] speed and informality sing a siren song of incompetent communication, a virtual hooker beckoning to the drunken sailor as he staggers along the wharf.&#8221;) to the more direct (&#8220;&#8230; it&#8217;s not enough to simply vomit out of your fingers. It&#8217;s important to say what you mean clearly, correctly and well&#8230;. It&#8217;s important to think before you write.&#8221;)</p>
<p>I want to believe him.  Goodness knows there&#8217;s some barely legible stuff out there.  But are things really more badder?</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t shake a niggle from the back of my mind.  Then I remembered what it was:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Two evils, Ignorance and Want of Taste, have produced a Third; I mean the continual Corruption of our <i>English</i> tongue, which, without some timely Remedy, will suffer more by the false Refinements of Twenty Years past than it hath been improved in the foregoing Hundred.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8212; Jonathan Swift, &#8220;The Continual Corruption of our English Tongue&#8221;, <i>The Tatler</i>, 1710.<tags>text, email, IM, standards, punctuation, grammar, the good old days, language, technology, Jonathan Swift</tags>   <strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/09/11/mailapp-flips-out/" rel="bookmark" title="11 September 2006, 10:16 pm">Mail.app flips out</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/10/entourageabmenu-update-special-offer/" rel="bookmark" title="10 June 2006, 10:30 am">EntourageABMenu: Update, special offer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/" rel="bookmark" title="25 June 2009, 8:43 pm">Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/12/06/mac-webmail-interface-screws-css-email-marketers/" rel="bookmark" title="6 December 2006, 11:58 pm">.Mac webmail interface screws CSS, email marketers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/26/more-technology-less-productivity/" rel="bookmark" title="26 February 2006, 12:53 am">More technology, less productivity</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 44.378 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/21/wired-copy-chief-vents-spleen-over-language-and-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail chats up</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/08/gmail-chats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/08/gmail-chats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chatalog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iChat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/08/gmail-chats-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users can now see when their Gmail Talk buddies are online, save transcripts of their chats as if they were emails and initiate chats with one click, all from the browser interface.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail <a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/help/chat.html">has announced</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that it is integrating its IM facility, Talk, into Gmail&#8217;s web-based interface. </p>
<p>Users can now see when their Talk buddies are online, save transcripts of their chats as if they were emails and initiate chats with one click, all from the browser interface. </p>
<p>The transition will occur &#8220;over the next few weeks&#8221; and <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/02/07/gmail/index.php?lsrc=mwrss">according to MacWorld</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> will be limited to users of the US English language interface.</p>
<p>Gmail has released an annotated screenshot of the new interface for those who are still waiting:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/wp-images/TalkingGmail.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/wp-images/TalkingGmail.jpg','popup','width=800,height=575,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/wp-images/TalkingGmail-tm.jpg" height="287" width="400" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="10" alt="TalkingGmail" title="TalkingGmail" /></a><br /><small>Click image for a larger copy</small></div>
<p>Of course, Mail.app users already enjoy integration with iChat and the ability to email themselves transcripts of their chats automatically using <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/08/10/chatalog-integrating-ichat-logs-into-mail/">Chatalog</a>, but many are welcoming this as &#8220;the next logical step in web-based mail&#8221; (so the <a href="http://radioactiveyak.blogspot.com/2006/02/google-integrates-chat-with-mail.html">Radioactive Yak <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>)</a>.<tags>Gmail, Talk, chat, ichat, web interface, Chatalog, Web 2.0, transcripts, IM, contacts</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/08/10/chatalog-integrating-ichat-logs-into-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="10 August 2005, 7:03 pm">Chatalog &#8211; Integrating iChat logs into Mail</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/12/yojimbo-tip-searchable-ichat-transcripts/" rel="bookmark" title="12 April 2006, 10:39 pm">Yojimbo tip: Searchable iChat transcripts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/29/updates-for-serial-mail-and-gmailgrowl-plug-ins/" rel="bookmark" title="29 September 2005, 3:09 pm">Updates: Serial Mail, Chatalog and Gmail+Growl</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/06/chatalog-121/" rel="bookmark" title="6 October 2005, 9:24 pm">Chatalog 1.2.<strike>1</strike>2</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/06/mail-widget-round-up/" rel="bookmark" title="6 September 2005, 12:19 am">Mail Widget Round-up</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 46.440 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/08/gmail-chats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

