<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hawk Wings &#187; communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/tag/communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Seven Deadly Sins of Email</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not apple mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not mail.app]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knowledge workers like me (and you?) spend much of the day pushing emails around from one place to another. So nothing is more annoying than people who thoughtlessly waste time and effort by composing their emails badly. Once a week perhaps, sometimes more, I find myself looking at an email with a death wish. Scott [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/killemail.jpg" alt="Killemail" height="143"  align="right" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="0" width="200"/>Knowledge workers like me (and you?) spend much of the day pushing emails around from one place to another.  </p>
<p>So nothing is more annoying than people who thoughtlessly waste time and effort by composing their emails badly. Once a week perhaps, sometimes more, I find myself looking at an email with a death wish.</p>
<p>Scott Young has composed <a href="http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2007/10/23/the-7-bad-e-mail-habits-that-make-people-want-to-kill-you/" title="Scott H Young &raquo; The 7 Bad E-Mail Habits that Make People Want to Kill You">a list of seven bad email habits</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> that make readers want to kill you.</p>
<p>He lists the obvious offenders &#8212; the hanging question, the buried request (with a fine example of how not to ask a question), and bulky paragraphs &#8212; as bad in snail mail as they are in email and which come from unthinking composition in any medium.</p>
<p>But then there are the email-specific sins.  Think carefully enough about your email, he suggests, to work out if email is the right tool for the task:</p>
<blockquote><p>E-mail works best for direct and non-time sensitive information. Conversations, discussions and anything that requires a heavy amount of back-and-forth should be done on the phone or in person. Trying to use e-mail to have these conversations can be slow, time-consuming and painful.</p></blockquote>
<p>This extends to using email as emergency communication for urgent requests. If you need a response right away, the phone (or getting up and walking down the corridor) is the answer, not email.  Don&#8217;t forget there are people who (unbelievably) only answer their emails once or twice a day.</p>
<p>And lastly he lists my most besetting sin, being an email smart arse:</p>
<blockquote><p>Donâ€™t try to be witty or sarcastic in an e-mail and pretend as if everything you say will be taken literally. Although a few metaphors can come across well in an e-mail, most donâ€™t&#8230;. And donâ€™t think using emoticons gives you the green-light to be clever and charming.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes, I find myself going so flat-chat to get to Inbox Zero that I dash stuff off without thinking, thus unwittingly making even more work for myself. It&#8217;s a kind of anti-productivity strategy. </p>
<p>There must be a better way. &#8220;Festina lente&#8221;, as Erasmus (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasmus" title="Desiderius Erasmus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia">Wikipedia</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>) might have said when opening his own inbox. <tags>email, not apple mail, not mail.app, communication, productivity</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/30/sorting-mailbox-order-manually/" rel="bookmark" title="30 January 2006, 8:10 am">Sorting mailbox order manually</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/15/more-on-the-iphones-rich-html-email-client/" rel="bookmark" title="15 January 2007, 12:20 am">More on iPhone&#8217;s &#8220;rich HTML&#8221; email client</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/12/06/smarter-searches-in-leopard-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="6 December 2007, 11:51 pm">Smarter Searches in Leopard Mail</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/03/22/two-tips-to-manage-your-email-better/" rel="bookmark" title="22 March 2006, 12:08 am">Two tips to manage your email better</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/" rel="bookmark" title="4 May 2006, 10:29 pm">Email first, think later: A practical demonstration</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 7.013 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email first, think later: A practical demonstration</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-respect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy Latter has posted an email that he received on Wednesday morning.It was sent out to all members of the Industry Canada network by the Industry Canada's "Messaging Support Specialistâ€.Good morning everyone,This message is directed to BlackBerry users who are unable to send messages from their BB devices.Please answer â€œYESâ€ if you are experiecing problems or â€œNOâ€ if not.There are least two things wrong with this email.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/wp-images/thinker.jpg" height="140" width="100" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="thinker" title="thinker" />Andy Latter <a href="http://blog.gethelp.ca/2006/05/03/think-before-you-email/">has posted</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> an email that he received earlier this week.</p>
<p>It was sent out to all members of the Industry Canada network by Industry Canada&#8217;s &#8220;Messaging Support Specialistâ€:</p>
<blockquote><p>Good morning everyone,<br />
This message is directed to BlackBerry users who are unable to send messages from their BB devices.<br />
Please answer â€œYESâ€ if you are experiecing problems or â€œNOâ€ if not.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are at least two things wrong with this email. </p>
<p>One of them is more significant than the other, but both are clear demonstrations of an important principle: Think first. Email later.<tags>email, self-respect, industry canada, productivity, communication</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/01/21/an-automated-email-of-the-weeks-upcoming-events/" rel="bookmark" title="21 January 2008, 11:50 pm">An automated email of the week&#8217;s upcoming events</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/14/what-is-it-with-canada/" rel="bookmark" title="14 January 2006, 9:17 pm">What is it with Canada?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/15/spanning-sync-gets-more-reliable/" rel="bookmark" title="15 November 2007, 9:38 pm">Spanning Sync gets more reliable</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2008/06/24/up-to-date-mail-stamp-icon-for-canada/" rel="bookmark" title="24 June 2008, 10:53 pm">Up-to-date mail stamp icon for Canada</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/07/secure-email-over-wireless-for-apple-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="7 November 2005, 10:04 pm">Secure email over wireless for Apple Mail</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 69.930 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/05/04/email-first-think-later-a-practical-demonstration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawk Wings Easter Message</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail.app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscommunication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[those who have ears let them ear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avoid other causes of communication breakdown: Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s 12 tips for better emailing How email fuels miscommunication Merlin Mann on working smarter and faster A brief guide to email style and manners The Ten Commandments of email according to Intel email, communication, miscommunication, those who have ears let them ear, Easter, humour, humor, productivity, etiquette, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/easterbunnies430px.jpg" height="290" width="430" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="10" alt="easterbunnies430px" title="easterbunnies430px" /></div>
<div align="center"></div>
<p>Avoid other causes of communication breakdown:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/05/12-tips-for-better-emailing-guy-kawasaki/">Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s 12 tips for better emailing</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/">How email fuels miscommunication</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.43folders.com/2005/02/five_fast_email.html">Merlin Mann on working smarter and faster</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wap.org/journal/emailrules/default.html">A brief guide to email style and manners</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/16/ten-commandments-of-email-according-to-intel/">The Ten Commandments of email according to Intel</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/></li>
</ul>
<p><tags>email, communication, miscommunication, those who have ears let them ear, Easter, humour, humor, productivity, etiquette, apple mail, mail.app</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/19/email-keeping-it-simple/" rel="bookmark" title="19 September 2005, 10:30 am">Email: Keeping it simple</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/16/ten-commandments-of-email-according-to-intel/" rel="bookmark" title="16 November 2005, 11:07 pm">Ten Commandments of Email according to Intel</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/" rel="bookmark" title="6 February 2006, 9:15 am">How email fuels miscommunication</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/" rel="bookmark" title="11 April 2006, 12:33 am">British survey of online etiquette</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/05/belated-beautiful-blogless-beach-break/" rel="bookmark" title="5 April 2007, 1:58 am">Belated Big Beautiful Blogless Beach Break</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 9.777 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British survey of online etiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British ISP ntl:Telewest has published the results of a recent survey on etiquette in email, IM and SMS communication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/email_etiquette.jpg" height="113" width="100" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="0" alt="email_etiquette" title="email_etiquette" />British ISP ntl:Telewest <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/research_insights/press_room/press_campaigns/business_etiquette.html">has published the results</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> of a recent survey on etiquette in email, IM and SMS communication.</p>
<p>The survey of over 1,468 (53% male / 47% female) office workers contains few surprises, although it is interesting to compare the results with similar US studies on <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/02/how-men-and-women-use-email-differently/">email use and gender</a> and <a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/26/more-technology-less-productivity/">email productivity</a>.</p>
<p>Email is the electronic medium of choice. The report found that &#8220;more people said they were addicted to email in the workplace than any other medium, with 78% of respondents claiming they couldnâ€™t live without it.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, it seems email is not always being used for work-related purposes.  UK offices are full of what the report describes as &#8220;bad behaviour&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>Professionals arenâ€™t only using email to make corporate deals. 40% use the tool for gossip, 54% for socialising, and 60% for dealing with issues regarding their relationships with coworkers. Men are more likely than women to use email for socialising, whereas women are more likely to use it for gossiping.</p></blockquote>
<p>The study asked respondents how long they needed to wait for a reply to an email before considering the recipient of the original email rude:</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/wp-images/UKemailresponsetimes.jpg" height="220" width="430" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="5" alt="UKemailresponsetimes" title="UKemailresponsetimes" /></div>
<p>The survey also found that younger respondents were more adventurous in their communication channels than older ones, and males more than females.  </p>
<p>In British offices, traditional communication methods remain important: &#8220;Leaving aside email for the moment, a high number of respondents rely more heavily on traditional methods of communications&#8230;. 29% use both fax and letter each day â€“ although this figure rises the older the respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally the report identified three stereotypes in British workplaces.  It&#8217;s always fun to think about which category your fellow workers fall in, so here they are:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The OAT (Old Age Technologist)</strong><br />
OATs are not necessarily old in age, but have more dated attitudes towards new communication technologies. OATs realise new technologies are becoming more prevalent in the workplace, but they&#8217;re dealing with this change by maintaining their tried and tested ways of communication. OATs are not sure how or why people have taken so readily to &#8216;new age&#8217; communications tools. </p>
<p><strong>The ESBO (Easily Sociable Behaviour Online)</strong><br />
Very comfortable when using modern communications, ESBOs are as happy text messaging their boss as IM&#8217;ing a client or taking part in a video conference. The ESBO zooms through the workday checking emails upwards of 300 times. Some ESBOs love the phone, some hate it, but the critical matter is that IM, text messaging and email have become more important than even their desks. </p>
<p><strong>The StoIC (Slow to Implement Change)</strong><br />
The SToIC follows etiquette rules and doesn&#8217;t stray from accepted comfort zones. If there isn&#8217;t a generally accepted way of using a new technology the SToIC will avoid it altogether. The SToIC is still using the fax on a regular basis and would rarely consider writing a text message for work purposes.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you are not sure which one you are, you can <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/research_insights/press_room/press_campaigns/Etiquette_quiz/bus_etiquette_quiz.html">take an online survey</a>  <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> to find out.</p>
<p>The findings of the report are available online in PDF form as an <a href="http://www.telewest.co.uk/business/documents/press_campaigns/Etiquette_summary.pdf">executive summary</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/>.<tags>email, productivity, etiquette, IM, SMS, communication</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/11/12/where-did-the-day-go/" rel="bookmark" title="12 November 2005, 6:16 pm">Where did the day go?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2010/05/20/uk-survey-shows-death-of-email-premature/" rel="bookmark" title="20 May 2010, 10:48 pm">UK Survey proves &#8220;death of email&#8221; premature</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/" rel="bookmark" title="15 April 2006, 1:10 am">Hawk Wings Easter Message</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/07/25/a-third-of-bloggers-consider-themselves-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="25 July 2006, 1:31 am">A third of bloggers consider themselves journalists</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/02/how-men-and-women-use-email-differently/" rel="bookmark" title="2 January 2006, 12:20 am">How men and women use email differently</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 42.728 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/11/british-survey-on-online-etiquette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How email fuels miscommunication</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[being a wise-ass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscommunication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research has discovered that the inability to see things from another person's point of view is the cause of increasing email-based miscommunication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/wp-content/wp-images/speechbubbles.jpg" height="73" width="65" border="0" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="5" alt="speechbubbles" title="speechbubbles" /><a href="http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb06/egos.html">New research</a> <img src="http://www.hawkwings.net/images/extlink.jpg"/> has confirmed something that most people must already know. </p>
<p>Egotism and the inability to see things from another person&#8217;s point of view are the causes of increasing email-based miscommunication.</p>
<p>The study by two psychologists at the University of Chicago found that </p>
<blockquote><p>people overestimate both their ability to convey their intended tone?¢‚Ç¨‚Äúbe it sarcastic, serious or funny?¢‚Ç¨‚Äúwhen they send an e-mail, as well as their ability to correctly interpret the tone of messages others send to them.</p></blockquote>
<p>The solution, one of the researchers says, is to pick up the phone.</p>
<p>&#8220;E-mail is fine,&#8221; he suggests, &#8220;if you just want to communicate content but not any emotional material.&#8221; </p>
<p>Be careful.<tags>email, communication, miscommunication, ego, emotion, being a wise-ass</tags><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/04/15/hawk-wings-easter-message/" rel="bookmark" title="15 April 2006, 1:10 am">Hawk Wings Easter Message</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/09/08/the-plug-in-graveyard/" rel="bookmark" title="8 September 2005, 4:11 pm">The Plug-in Graveyard</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/07/icalmail-emails-from-ical-at-a-fixed-time/" rel="bookmark" title="7 October 2005, 2:20 pm">iCalMail: Emails from iCal at a fixed time</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/12/23/exploding-email/" rel="bookmark" title="23 December 2005, 9:49 am">Exploding email</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/07/26/broken-hyperlinks-in-apple-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="26 July 2005, 11:33 pm">Broken hyperlinks in Apple Mail</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 42.448 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/02/06/how-email-fuels-miscommunication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

