<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330208</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330208</guid>
		<description>I kinda like the idea of broken HTML support in Outlook, maybe soon no one will use HTML in emails anymore.

That would be a big step forward!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like the idea of broken HTML support in Outlook, maybe soon no one will use HTML in emails anymore.</p>
<p>That would be a big step forward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant &#124; ScriptRemix.com Scripts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330206</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant &#124; ScriptRemix.com Scripts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330206</guid>
		<description>[...] More:  Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:  Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbah</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330183</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330183</guid>
		<description>...and furthermore, why the heck do they make you set the view characteristics of every stinkin&#039; folder individually insteada allowing settings to cover all folders as an option ...irks me blind these kinds of stupidities that restrict the user to the m$ mold (as in moldy)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and furthermore, why the heck do they make you set the view characteristics of every stinkin&#8217; folder individually insteada allowing settings to cover all folders as an option &#8230;irks me blind these kinds of stupidities that restrict the user to the m$ mold (as in moldy)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbah</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330181</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330181</guid>
		<description>My favorite thing was to embed ani gifs in mail to the delight of many of my recipients ...well, no more!!  ...to do it now, I open m$ie and open the gmail portal and send it there ...google had the good sense to add that feature back a while ago ...bought office 2007 premiere (happily for only $59, not $600) and did so in hopes, especially for outlook, of benefiting from the expanded limit in size of the .pst folder ...well, I miss my old outlook 2002 and shudda gotten a ratty old copy of outlook 2003 offa ebay and left the rest alone ...interface stinks and is bothersome and wastes real estate to boot ...it&#039;s a resource hog too ...billgates is itchin&#039; for a lynchin&#039; imho!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite thing was to embed ani gifs in mail to the delight of many of my recipients &#8230;well, no more!!  &#8230;to do it now, I open m$ie and open the gmail portal and send it there &#8230;google had the good sense to add that feature back a while ago &#8230;bought office 2007 premiere (happily for only $59, not $600) and did so in hopes, especially for outlook, of benefiting from the expanded limit in size of the .pst folder &#8230;well, I miss my old outlook 2002 and shudda gotten a ratty old copy of outlook 2003 offa ebay and left the rest alone &#8230;interface stinks and is bothersome and wastes real estate to boot &#8230;it&#8217;s a resource hog too &#8230;billgates is itchin&#8217; for a lynchin&#8217; imho!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: where can I get free porno blocking on my email ? &#124; Email Blacklist</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330091</link>
		<dc:creator>where can I get free porno blocking on my email ? &#124; Email Blacklist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330091</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant &#124; Hawk Wings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant | Hawk Wings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWD Weekend Reading List</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330080</link>
		<dc:creator>WWD Weekend Reading List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330080</guid>
		<description>[...] Hawk Wings: Microsoft Outlook to Remain HTML Non-Compliant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hawk Wings: Microsoft Outlook to Remain HTML Non-Compliant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Sutton &#8217;s lifestream activity for June 25th &#124; WayneSutton.me</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330069</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Sutton &#8217;s lifestream activity for June 25th &#124; WayneSutton.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330069</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant &#8212; 10:43am via Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Outlook to remain HTML non-compliant &mdash; 10:43am via Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330063</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330063</guid>
		<description>&quot;This should be a rebuttal to all those who say Microsoft is open standards supportive&quot;

What deluded maniac would ever even try to claim that?

For example, IE&#039;s abysmal failure here:

http://acid3.acidtests.org/

is well known.

And did people miss this?

http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/follow-up-on-excel-2007-sp2s-odf.html

Never has been &quot;open standards supportive&quot;, never will be.

There&#039;s been a drive to add *some* more standards support into IE -- mainly, one feels, so as not to annoy the web development community, which resents the extra work getting around its quirks causes, and which has been saying so vocally.  That&#039;s bad publicity.

But don&#039;t expect to see serious HMTL5 and SVG support any time soon.  That would conflict with MS&#039;s desire to take over ownership of the web with Silverlight.

Never has been &quot;open standards supportive&quot;, never will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This should be a rebuttal to all those who say Microsoft is open standards supportive&#8221;</p>
<p>What deluded maniac would ever even try to claim that?</p>
<p>For example, IE&#8217;s abysmal failure here:</p>
<p><a href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/" rel="nofollow">http://acid3.acidtests.org/</a></p>
<p>is well known.</p>
<p>And did people miss this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/follow-up-on-excel-2007-sp2s-odf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/follow-up-on-excel-2007-sp2s-odf.html</a></p>
<p>Never has been &#8220;open standards supportive&#8221;, never will be.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a drive to add *some* more standards support into IE &#8212; mainly, one feels, so as not to annoy the web development community, which resents the extra work getting around its quirks causes, and which has been saying so vocally.  That&#8217;s bad publicity.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t expect to see serious HMTL5 and SVG support any time soon.  That would conflict with MS&#8217;s desire to take over ownership of the web with Silverlight.</p>
<p>Never has been &#8220;open standards supportive&#8221;, never will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D9</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330061</link>
		<dc:creator>D9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330061</guid>
		<description>This should be a rebuttal to all those who say Microsoft is open standards supportive, more so than Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a rebuttal to all those who say Microsoft is open standards supportive, more so than Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombonner's status on Thursday, 25-Jun-09 16:54:36 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/comment-page-1/#comment-330059</link>
		<dc:creator>tombonner's status on Thursday, 25-Jun-09 16:54:36 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2009/06/25/microsoft-outlook-to-remain-html-non-compliant/#comment-330059</guid>
		<description>[...] No big surprise; Microsoft Outlook will continue to shun HTML standards in the 2010 version: http://bit.ly/yMAWX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No big surprise; Microsoft Outlook will continue to shun HTML standards in the 2010 version: <a href="http://bit.ly/yMAWX" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/yMAWX</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

