<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Seven Deadly Sins of Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gaden</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/comment-page-1/#comment-263524</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/#comment-263524</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...  Sure, some people will have Blackberrys, but is the market penetration strong enough to make that a strategy for everyone?

I guess I don&#039;t have enough business friends, or at least, my work colleagues as a rule still put too much distance between themselves and their emails to make that a sensible rule of thumb. But, in other contexts, perhaps you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;  Sure, some people will have Blackberrys, but is the market penetration strong enough to make that a strategy for everyone?</p>
<p>I guess I don&#8217;t have enough business friends, or at least, my work colleagues as a rule still put too much distance between themselves and their emails to make that a sensible rule of thumb. But, in other contexts, perhaps you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/comment-page-1/#comment-263478</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/11/05/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-email/#comment-263478</guid>
		<description>you wrote:

This extends to using email as emergency communication for urgent requests. If you need a response right away, the phone (or getting up and walking down the corridor) is the answer, not email. Donâ€™t forget there are people who (unbelievably) only answer their emails once or twice a day.

I disagree.  In the business world your recipient will have a blackberry to answer you immediately,  even when in a meeting where taking a call would be inappropriate. Immediate response to email is the new expectation. . . . . the new minimum standard. Phone calls go to voice mail. Listening to voice mail is tedious, sequential and time consuming. Voice is a useful, but secondary, means of communication in case of emergency. Email is primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you wrote:</p>
<p>This extends to using email as emergency communication for urgent requests. If you need a response right away, the phone (or getting up and walking down the corridor) is the answer, not email. Donâ€™t forget there are people who (unbelievably) only answer their emails once or twice a day.</p>
<p>I disagree.  In the business world your recipient will have a blackberry to answer you immediately,  even when in a meeting where taking a call would be inappropriate. Immediate response to email is the new expectation. . . . . the new minimum standard. Phone calls go to voice mail. Listening to voice mail is tedious, sequential and time consuming. Voice is a useful, but secondary, means of communication in case of emergency. Email is primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.281 seconds -->
