<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MailTags 2.0 Public Beta 10: Even smarter IMAP tag handling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Shand</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-164393</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Shand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/#comment-164393</guid>
		<description>From page 21 of the User Manual ...

How do MailTags 2.0 differ from IMAP permanent flags? 

Many IMAP servers have the ability to apply keywords (or flags) to messages. These flags work differently than MailTags in several ways. First and foremost, MailTags will write its data to the headers of the message. While this involves more interaction with the server, indev believes that most messages are small enough and most connections with IMAP servers are fast enough to minimize performance issues. By having data in the headers, MailTags can store and organize data much better, separating keywords from projects, allowing for 
dates, notes and keywords that include Unicode text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From page 21 of the User Manual &#8230;</p>
<p>How do MailTags 2.0 differ from IMAP permanent flags? </p>
<p>Many IMAP servers have the ability to apply keywords (or flags) to messages. These flags work differently than MailTags in several ways. First and foremost, MailTags will write its data to the headers of the message. While this involves more interaction with the server, indev believes that most messages are small enough and most connections with IMAP servers are fast enough to minimize performance issues. By having data in the headers, MailTags can store and organize data much better, separating keywords from projects, allowing for<br />
dates, notes and keywords that include Unicode text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Pavlic</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-164351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Pavlic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/#comment-164351</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is covered somewhere... does MailTags actually use IMAP keywords? That is, does it use the IMAP protocol to store those keywords? Or does it dump the keywords into a message stored in a hidden folder on the IMAP server? Or does it just modify message headers? (remember that IMAP servers like Courier do not store keywords in the message; they&#039;re stored in separate index files in each folder)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this is covered somewhere&#8230; does MailTags actually use IMAP keywords? That is, does it use the IMAP protocol to store those keywords? Or does it dump the keywords into a message stored in a hidden folder on the IMAP server? Or does it just modify message headers? (remember that IMAP servers like Courier do not store keywords in the message; they&#8217;re stored in separate index files in each folder)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Shand</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-135848</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Shand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/#comment-135848</guid>
		<description>Hrm ... I use GPGMail as well, in this case I removed both GPGMaIl and MailTags at the same time so I could have confused the symptoms.

However I wasn&#039;t having problems with GPGMail installed before I installed MailTags.  I shall investigate more throughly, thanks for the sanity check.

Adam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm &#8230; I use GPGMail as well, in this case I removed both GPGMaIl and MailTags at the same time so I could have confused the symptoms.</p>
<p>However I wasn&#8217;t having problems with GPGMail installed before I installed MailTags.  I shall investigate more throughly, thanks for the sanity check.</p>
<p>Adam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-130009</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/#comment-130009</guid>
		<description>I have not noticed with MailTags but did experience, and still do, this problem whenever I install the GPGMail bundle plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not noticed with MailTags but did experience, and still do, this problem whenever I install the GPGMail bundle plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Shand</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-129530</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Shand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/04/16/mailtags-20-public-beta-10-even-smarter-imap-tag-handling/#comment-129530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed MailTags twice now (once a couple days ago and once about a year ago) and both times after installing I immediately noticed that messages on my IMAP server didn&#039;t stay marked as read consistantly.

Has anyone else noticed this or is it something particular about my setup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve installed MailTags twice now (once a couple days ago and once about a year ago) and both times after installing I immediately noticed that messages on my IMAP server didn&#8217;t stay marked as read consistantly.</p>
<p>Has anyone else noticed this or is it something particular about my setup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

