<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actiontastic 0.9 gets iCal sync support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/15/actiontastic-09-gets-ical-sync-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/15/actiontastic-09-gets-ical-sync-support/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: isb</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/15/actiontastic-09-gets-ical-sync-support/#comment-63204</link>
		<dc:creator>isb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/15/actiontastic-09-gets-ical-sync-support/#comment-63204</guid>
		<description>I like Ghost Action better than Actiontastic in terms of "leanness". GA allows for a very flexible GTD implementation, whereas actiontastic seems to have a very explicit and "in your face" GTD approach. (cf the popup dialog when you "Process" your inbox)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Ghost Action better than Actiontastic in terms of &#8220;leanness&#8221;. GA allows for a very flexible GTD implementation, whereas actiontastic seems to have a very explicit and &#8220;in your face&#8221; GTD approach. (cf the popup dialog when you &#8220;Process&#8221; your inbox)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.338 seconds -->
