<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell, Apple Computer, Inc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gibbons Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61636</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibbons Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61636</guid>
		<description>The discipline of having to run OS X in such a resource-limited device as the new iPhone will have ripple effects for the entire product line. They will be forced to optimize the OS to the nth degree and can't afford to let the OS become subject to code bloat. I reckon the fruits of the optimization they have had to perform to get OS X working well on iPhone will show up in 10.5 (Leopard).

iPhone also represents Apple's foray into tablet computing. A very small tablet, mind you, but there will be a demand for similar devices but bigger. Think Mac Book Pro with the the main unit missing - all you have is the LCD display and a bezel - an iPhone with a 15" diagonal touch screen.

Jobs quoted Alan Kay during the presentation. Recall Kay's Dynabook?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook

or Sculley's Knowledge Navigator?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator

iPhone is a leap in that direction. It's unusual, though that a product starts out being a mini version of what it will ultimately become, but the iPhone is the future of Apple's computers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discipline of having to run OS X in such a resource-limited device as the new iPhone will have ripple effects for the entire product line. They will be forced to optimize the OS to the nth degree and can&#8217;t afford to let the OS become subject to code bloat. I reckon the fruits of the optimization they have had to perform to get OS X working well on iPhone will show up in 10.5 (Leopard).</p>
<p>iPhone also represents Apple&#8217;s foray into tablet computing. A very small tablet, mind you, but there will be a demand for similar devices but bigger. Think Mac Book Pro with the the main unit missing - all you have is the LCD display and a bezel - an iPhone with a 15&#8243; diagonal touch screen.</p>
<p>Jobs quoted Alan Kay during the presentation. Recall Kay&#8217;s Dynabook?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook</a></p>
<p>or Sculley&#8217;s Knowledge Navigator?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator</a></p>
<p>iPhone is a leap in that direction. It&#8217;s unusual, though that a product starts out being a mini version of what it will ultimately become, but the iPhone is the future of Apple&#8217;s computers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Flynn</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61605</link>
		<dc:creator>David Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61605</guid>
		<description>Well, it struck me that this year's MacWorld was very much "The MacWorld without Macs"! So I guess the shift from Apple Computer to Apple was pretty much in keeping with this - after all, the keynote didn't really deal with _any_ computers (well, not as we know them).

By memory (and I could be wrong, so I trust that that others with longer and more Mac-centric memories than mine will set me to rights if that is the case) this is the first time that Job's MacWorld keynote has not unveilled, announced a refresh or otherwise showcased some form of Mac - be it anything from a notebook to a desktop or a server, or even a key system component such as a display.

Eagle-eyed folk should also note that nor did we see any new software on parade - no updates to iLife or iWork, and of course not even a glimpse of Leopard (and without a schill for the OS here was no reason for Jobs to trot out a spokesperson from Adobe or Microsoft to briefly spruik forthcoming versions of CS3 or Office:Mac 2008 in support of the Mac OS).

I've got no doubt that all of those things will occur in the months ahead, most likely at a mix of scheduled events (such as other MacWorld expos plus WWDC) and specially-held launches (Apple has done quite a few of those in the past two years, as well as just slipping out some updated machines with just a press release!).

But all of this - the almost total and undoubtedly deliberate 'ignorance' (in the proper meaning of the word) of anything connected with the traditional 'computing' side of Apple, so that the keynote was almost entirely devoted to the 'digital lifestyle' products and partnerships of 'the new more-than-just-computers' Apple -- it all seemed intended to underscore what Jobs was saying by rubbing out the 'Computer' from Apple' his company's name and "skating to where the puck would be, not where is is now".

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it struck me that this year&#8217;s MacWorld was very much &#8220;The MacWorld without Macs&#8221;! So I guess the shift from Apple Computer to Apple was pretty much in keeping with this - after all, the keynote didn&#8217;t really deal with _any_ computers (well, not as we know them).</p>
<p>By memory (and I could be wrong, so I trust that that others with longer and more Mac-centric memories than mine will set me to rights if that is the case) this is the first time that Job&#8217;s MacWorld keynote has not unveilled, announced a refresh or otherwise showcased some form of Mac - be it anything from a notebook to a desktop or a server, or even a key system component such as a display.</p>
<p>Eagle-eyed folk should also note that nor did we see any new software on parade - no updates to iLife or iWork, and of course not even a glimpse of Leopard (and without a schill for the OS here was no reason for Jobs to trot out a spokesperson from Adobe or Microsoft to briefly spruik forthcoming versions of CS3 or Office:Mac 2008 in support of the Mac OS).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got no doubt that all of those things will occur in the months ahead, most likely at a mix of scheduled events (such as other MacWorld expos plus WWDC) and specially-held launches (Apple has done quite a few of those in the past two years, as well as just slipping out some updated machines with just a press release!).</p>
<p>But all of this - the almost total and undoubtedly deliberate &#8216;ignorance&#8217; (in the proper meaning of the word) of anything connected with the traditional &#8216;computing&#8217; side of Apple, so that the keynote was almost entirely devoted to the &#8216;digital lifestyle&#8217; products and partnerships of &#8216;the new more-than-just-computers&#8217; Apple &#8212; it all seemed intended to underscore what Jobs was saying by rubbing out the &#8216;Computer&#8217; from Apple&#8217; his company&#8217;s name and &#8220;skating to where the puck would be, not where is is now&#8221;.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gaden</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61506</guid>
		<description>SomeOne: Fair point. Laziness on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SomeOne: Fair point. Laziness on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeOne</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61505</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61505</guid>
		<description>Minor nitpick:  Note that the indication in the article that "Apple Computers, Inc became Apple, Inc." is not quite correct - the company has NEVER been "Apple Computer_S_", and it's frustrating to see so many references to that name (it's a very common mistake across the web.)

Apple Computer, Inc. was incorporated on January 3rd, 1977.  And, I think it's great that just after their 30th anniversary, they have changed their name to Apple Inc. - to stress their expansion into the consumer electronics space.  Of course, the press releases and copyright block on most communications have simply indicated "Apple..." for quite some time now, so it seems this official change has been on its way for a while.

Here's to the next 30 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor nitpick:  Note that the indication in the article that &#8220;Apple Computers, Inc became Apple, Inc.&#8221; is not quite correct - the company has NEVER been &#8220;Apple Computer_S_&#8221;, and it&#8217;s frustrating to see so many references to that name (it&#8217;s a very common mistake across the web.)</p>
<p>Apple Computer, Inc. was incorporated on January 3rd, 1977.  And, I think it&#8217;s great that just after their 30th anniversary, they have changed their name to Apple Inc. - to stress their expansion into the consumer electronics space.  Of course, the press releases and copyright block on most communications have simply indicated &#8220;Apple&#8230;&#8221; for quite some time now, so it seems this official change has been on its way for a while.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to the next 30 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livemixer</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61367</link>
		<dc:creator>Livemixer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61367</guid>
		<description>All who worry about Apple losing focus on Macs as its core business have forgotten something very important about these new products that they share with iPods:

They are designed to work with computers, not to replace them!

In fact, a good argument can be made that the iPhone is a glorified computer accessory. Sure, you *could* enter all your Address Book contact info directly into one, but most of us enjoy being able to use all ten digits for data entry. You still need a computer for iPod content, for iPhoto &#38; contact sync, &#38; so on.

Nobody is going to own one of these things without first owning a computer. And just like with the iPod, a Mac is a better choice for all who value the ease of use that is the distinguishing feature of the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All who worry about Apple losing focus on Macs as its core business have forgotten something very important about these new products that they share with iPods:</p>
<p>They are designed to work with computers, not to replace them!</p>
<p>In fact, a good argument can be made that the iPhone is a glorified computer accessory. Sure, you *could* enter all your Address Book contact info directly into one, but most of us enjoy being able to use all ten digits for data entry. You still need a computer for iPod content, for iPhoto &amp; contact sync, &amp; so on.</p>
<p>Nobody is going to own one of these things without first owning a computer. And just like with the iPod, a Mac is a better choice for all who value the ease of use that is the distinguishing feature of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61344</guid>
		<description>Paul...yes it's OS X but not as we know it.  I'd compare the OS X in the iPhone to embedded Linux or Windows Portable.  You can't add apps and what you get from Cupertino is all what you're going to get.  It's more an iPod that is also a Blackberry rather than a 21st century Newton.  I think I'll sit this round of Apple kit out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul&#8230;yes it&#8217;s OS X but not as we know it.  I&#8217;d compare the OS X in the iPhone to embedded Linux or Windows Portable.  You can&#8217;t add apps and what you get from Cupertino is all what you&#8217;re going to get.  It&#8217;s more an iPod that is also a Blackberry rather than a 21st century Newton.  I think I&#8217;ll sit this round of Apple kit out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61271</guid>
		<description>Given all the press coverage dedicated to the iPhone, any other announcements would simply have been swamped and completely lost on the wider world. I assume it didn't make sense from a marketing perspective to have any other significant announcements... IMO, there will be a special event once the iPhone hubbub has died down a little, dedicated to the computer side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given all the press coverage dedicated to the iPhone, any other announcements would simply have been swamped and completely lost on the wider world. I assume it didn&#8217;t make sense from a marketing perspective to have any other significant announcements&#8230; IMO, there will be a special event once the iPhone hubbub has died down a little, dedicated to the computer side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinayd</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61263</link>
		<dc:creator>vinayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61263</guid>
		<description>I'm not nervous at all.  I actually found everything about the iphone rather thrilling.  like when the first mac came out.  It did make me sad, or at least a bit nostalgic.  but I just don't see the Apple laptops and desktops going the way of the Apple ][.  The whole face of computing changed yesterday; Apple is just leading the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not nervous at all.  I actually found everything about the iphone rather thrilling.  like when the first mac came out.  It did make me sad, or at least a bit nostalgic.  but I just don&#8217;t see the Apple laptops and desktops going the way of the Apple ][.  The whole face of computing changed yesterday; Apple is just leading the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61259</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61259</guid>
		<description>Would it really be so bad if Apple's amazing design was brought to more aspects of your life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it really be so bad if Apple&#8217;s amazing design was brought to more aspects of your life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeniorÃ© Soosy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61227</link>
		<dc:creator>SeniorÃ© Soosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61227</guid>
		<description>I saw a comment saying that the iPhone may just be the perfect trojan horse to win over even more Windows users. I think Mac market share has benefited tremendously by the iPod. It's all good for the platform I think. If there ever start to be signs of slowed OS/Hardware development, then maybe I'll worry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a comment saying that the iPhone may just be the perfect trojan horse to win over even more Windows users. I think Mac market share has benefited tremendously by the iPod. It&#8217;s all good for the platform I think. If there ever start to be signs of slowed OS/Hardware development, then maybe I&#8217;ll worry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.282 seconds -->
