<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell, Apple Computer, Inc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibbons Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61636</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibbons Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61636</guid>
		<description>The discipline of having to run OS X in such a resource-limited device as the new iPhone will have ripple effects for the entire product line. They will be forced to optimize the OS to the nth degree and can&#039;t afford to let the OS become subject to code bloat. I reckon the fruits of the optimization they have had to perform to get OS X working well on iPhone will show up in 10.5 (Leopard).

iPhone also represents Apple&#039;s foray into tablet computing. A very small tablet, mind you, but there will be a demand for similar devices but bigger. Think Mac Book Pro with the the main unit missing - all you have is the LCD display and a bezel - an iPhone with a 15&quot; diagonal touch screen.

Jobs quoted Alan Kay during the presentation. Recall Kay&#039;s Dynabook?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook

or Sculley&#039;s Knowledge Navigator?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator

iPhone is a leap in that direction. It&#039;s unusual, though that a product starts out being a mini version of what it will ultimately become, but the iPhone is the future of Apple&#039;s computers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discipline of having to run OS X in such a resource-limited device as the new iPhone will have ripple effects for the entire product line. They will be forced to optimize the OS to the nth degree and can&#8217;t afford to let the OS become subject to code bloat. I reckon the fruits of the optimization they have had to perform to get OS X working well on iPhone will show up in 10.5 (Leopard).</p>
<p>iPhone also represents Apple&#8217;s foray into tablet computing. A very small tablet, mind you, but there will be a demand for similar devices but bigger. Think Mac Book Pro with the the main unit missing &#8211; all you have is the LCD display and a bezel &#8211; an iPhone with a 15&#8243; diagonal touch screen.</p>
<p>Jobs quoted Alan Kay during the presentation. Recall Kay&#8217;s Dynabook?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook</a></p>
<p>or Sculley&#8217;s Knowledge Navigator?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Navigator</a></p>
<p>iPhone is a leap in that direction. It&#8217;s unusual, though that a product starts out being a mini version of what it will ultimately become, but the iPhone is the future of Apple&#8217;s computers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Flynn</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61605</link>
		<dc:creator>David Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61605</guid>
		<description>Well, it struck me that this year&#039;s MacWorld was very much &quot;The MacWorld without Macs&quot;! So I guess the shift from Apple Computer to Apple was pretty much in keeping with this - after all, the keynote didn&#039;t really deal with _any_ computers (well, not as we know them).

By memory (and I could be wrong, so I trust that that others with longer and more Mac-centric memories than mine will set me to rights if that is the case) this is the first time that Job&#039;s MacWorld keynote has not unveilled, announced a refresh or otherwise showcased some form of Mac - be it anything from a notebook to a desktop or a server, or even a key system component such as a display.

Eagle-eyed folk should also note that nor did we see any new software on parade - no updates to iLife or iWork, and of course not even a glimpse of Leopard (and without a schill for the OS here was no reason for Jobs to trot out a spokesperson from Adobe or Microsoft to briefly spruik forthcoming versions of CS3 or Office:Mac 2008 in support of the Mac OS).

I&#039;ve got no doubt that all of those things will occur in the months ahead, most likely at a mix of scheduled events (such as other MacWorld expos plus WWDC) and specially-held launches (Apple has done quite a few of those in the past two years, as well as just slipping out some updated machines with just a press release!).

But all of this - the almost total and undoubtedly deliberate &#039;ignorance&#039; (in the proper meaning of the word) of anything connected with the traditional &#039;computing&#039; side of Apple, so that the keynote was almost entirely devoted to the &#039;digital lifestyle&#039; products and partnerships of &#039;the new more-than-just-computers&#039; Apple -- it all seemed intended to underscore what Jobs was saying by rubbing out the &#039;Computer&#039; from Apple&#039; his company&#039;s name and &quot;skating to where the puck would be, not where is is now&quot;.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it struck me that this year&#8217;s MacWorld was very much &#8220;The MacWorld without Macs&#8221;! So I guess the shift from Apple Computer to Apple was pretty much in keeping with this &#8211; after all, the keynote didn&#8217;t really deal with _any_ computers (well, not as we know them).</p>
<p>By memory (and I could be wrong, so I trust that that others with longer and more Mac-centric memories than mine will set me to rights if that is the case) this is the first time that Job&#8217;s MacWorld keynote has not unveilled, announced a refresh or otherwise showcased some form of Mac &#8211; be it anything from a notebook to a desktop or a server, or even a key system component such as a display.</p>
<p>Eagle-eyed folk should also note that nor did we see any new software on parade &#8211; no updates to iLife or iWork, and of course not even a glimpse of Leopard (and without a schill for the OS here was no reason for Jobs to trot out a spokesperson from Adobe or Microsoft to briefly spruik forthcoming versions of CS3 or Office:Mac 2008 in support of the Mac OS).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got no doubt that all of those things will occur in the months ahead, most likely at a mix of scheduled events (such as other MacWorld expos plus WWDC) and specially-held launches (Apple has done quite a few of those in the past two years, as well as just slipping out some updated machines with just a press release!).</p>
<p>But all of this &#8211; the almost total and undoubtedly deliberate &#8216;ignorance&#8217; (in the proper meaning of the word) of anything connected with the traditional &#8216;computing&#8217; side of Apple, so that the keynote was almost entirely devoted to the &#8216;digital lifestyle&#8217; products and partnerships of &#8216;the new more-than-just-computers&#8217; Apple &#8212; it all seemed intended to underscore what Jobs was saying by rubbing out the &#8216;Computer&#8217; from Apple&#8217; his company&#8217;s name and &#8220;skating to where the puck would be, not where is is now&#8221;.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gaden</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61506</guid>
		<description>SomeOne: Fair point. Laziness on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SomeOne: Fair point. Laziness on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeOne</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61505</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61505</guid>
		<description>Minor nitpick:  Note that the indication in the article that &quot;Apple Computers, Inc became Apple, Inc.&quot; is not quite correct - the company has NEVER been &quot;Apple Computer_S_&quot;, and it&#039;s frustrating to see so many references to that name (it&#039;s a very common mistake across the web.)

Apple Computer, Inc. was incorporated on January 3rd, 1977.  And, I think it&#039;s great that just after their 30th anniversary, they have changed their name to Apple Inc. - to stress their expansion into the consumer electronics space.  Of course, the press releases and copyright block on most communications have simply indicated &quot;Apple...&quot; for quite some time now, so it seems this official change has been on its way for a while.

Here&#039;s to the next 30 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor nitpick:  Note that the indication in the article that &#8220;Apple Computers, Inc became Apple, Inc.&#8221; is not quite correct &#8211; the company has NEVER been &#8220;Apple Computer_S_&#8221;, and it&#8217;s frustrating to see so many references to that name (it&#8217;s a very common mistake across the web.)</p>
<p>Apple Computer, Inc. was incorporated on January 3rd, 1977.  And, I think it&#8217;s great that just after their 30th anniversary, they have changed their name to Apple Inc. &#8211; to stress their expansion into the consumer electronics space.  Of course, the press releases and copyright block on most communications have simply indicated &#8220;Apple&#8230;&#8221; for quite some time now, so it seems this official change has been on its way for a while.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to the next 30 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livemixer</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61367</link>
		<dc:creator>Livemixer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61367</guid>
		<description>All who worry about Apple losing focus on Macs as its core business have forgotten something very important about these new products that they share with iPods:

They are designed to work with computers, not to replace them!

In fact, a good argument can be made that the iPhone is a glorified computer accessory. Sure, you *could* enter all your Address Book contact info directly into one, but most of us enjoy being able to use all ten digits for data entry. You still need a computer for iPod content, for iPhoto &amp; contact sync, &amp; so on.

Nobody is going to own one of these things without first owning a computer. And just like with the iPod, a Mac is a better choice for all who value the ease of use that is the distinguishing feature of the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All who worry about Apple losing focus on Macs as its core business have forgotten something very important about these new products that they share with iPods:</p>
<p>They are designed to work with computers, not to replace them!</p>
<p>In fact, a good argument can be made that the iPhone is a glorified computer accessory. Sure, you *could* enter all your Address Book contact info directly into one, but most of us enjoy being able to use all ten digits for data entry. You still need a computer for iPod content, for iPhoto &amp; contact sync, &amp; so on.</p>
<p>Nobody is going to own one of these things without first owning a computer. And just like with the iPod, a Mac is a better choice for all who value the ease of use that is the distinguishing feature of the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61344</guid>
		<description>Paul...yes it&#039;s OS X but not as we know it.  I&#039;d compare the OS X in the iPhone to embedded Linux or Windows Portable.  You can&#039;t add apps and what you get from Cupertino is all what you&#039;re going to get.  It&#039;s more an iPod that is also a Blackberry rather than a 21st century Newton.  I think I&#039;ll sit this round of Apple kit out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul&#8230;yes it&#8217;s OS X but not as we know it.  I&#8217;d compare the OS X in the iPhone to embedded Linux or Windows Portable.  You can&#8217;t add apps and what you get from Cupertino is all what you&#8217;re going to get.  It&#8217;s more an iPod that is also a Blackberry rather than a 21st century Newton.  I think I&#8217;ll sit this round of Apple kit out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61271</guid>
		<description>Given all the press coverage dedicated to the iPhone, any other announcements would simply have been swamped and completely lost on the wider world. I assume it didn&#039;t make sense from a marketing perspective to have any other significant announcements... IMO, there will be a special event once the iPhone hubbub has died down a little, dedicated to the computer side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given all the press coverage dedicated to the iPhone, any other announcements would simply have been swamped and completely lost on the wider world. I assume it didn&#8217;t make sense from a marketing perspective to have any other significant announcements&#8230; IMO, there will be a special event once the iPhone hubbub has died down a little, dedicated to the computer side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinayd</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61263</link>
		<dc:creator>vinayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61263</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not nervous at all.  I actually found everything about the iphone rather thrilling.  like when the first mac came out.  It did make me sad, or at least a bit nostalgic.  but I just don&#039;t see the Apple laptops and desktops going the way of the Apple ][.  The whole face of computing changed yesterday; Apple is just leading the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not nervous at all.  I actually found everything about the iphone rather thrilling.  like when the first mac came out.  It did make me sad, or at least a bit nostalgic.  but I just don&#8217;t see the Apple laptops and desktops going the way of the Apple ][.  The whole face of computing changed yesterday; Apple is just leading the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61259</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61259</guid>
		<description>Would it really be so bad if Apple&#039;s amazing design was brought to more aspects of your life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it really be so bad if Apple&#8217;s amazing design was brought to more aspects of your life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeniorÃ© Soosy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-61227</link>
		<dc:creator>SeniorÃ© Soosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2007/01/10/farewell-apple-computer-inc/#comment-61227</guid>
		<description>I saw a comment saying that the iPhone may just be the perfect trojan horse to win over even more Windows users. I think Mac market share has benefited tremendously by the iPod. It&#039;s all good for the platform I think. If there ever start to be signs of slowed OS/Hardware development, then maybe I&#039;ll worry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a comment saying that the iPhone may just be the perfect trojan horse to win over even more Windows users. I think Mac market share has benefited tremendously by the iPod. It&#8217;s all good for the platform I think. If there ever start to be signs of slowed OS/Hardware development, then maybe I&#8217;ll worry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

