<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Jobs shows off NeXTSTEP, NeXTMail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28604</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28604</guid>
		<description>In 1992, Mail.app had already been around for 4 years.  When I first saw it at the 1988 NeXT introduction, I was very impressed.  Of course, by 1992, Mail.app had already been extensible (via bundles) for a couple of years, and a plethora of extensions were available (many bundled together in packages like EnhanceMail).  Unfortunately, Mac OS X Mail.app is far less extensible than its NeXT forbearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1992, Mail.app had already been around for 4 years.  When I first saw it at the 1988 NeXT introduction, I was very impressed.  Of course, by 1992, Mail.app had already been extensible (via bundles) for a couple of years, and a plethora of extensions were available (many bundled together in packages like EnhanceMail).  Unfortunately, Mac OS X Mail.app is far less extensible than its NeXT forbearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony martin</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28552</link>
		<dc:creator>tony martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28552</guid>
		<description>Oh, I have to correct myself, MS did 'invest' $150 million into Apple back in '99. As I recall, they profited from that when the Apple shares went up two years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I have to correct myself, MS did &#8216;invest&#8217; $150 million into Apple back in &#8216;99. As I recall, they profited from that when the Apple shares went up two years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony martin</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28551</link>
		<dc:creator>tony martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28551</guid>
		<description>"Itâ€™s amazing how many of Mac OS Xâ€™s key features were actually ported over from the previous OS."

Not really, considering Apple paid $400 million for it. What is amazing is how many features from NeXTSTEP and Mac OS is ported into Windows and Microsoft paid nothing for it.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Itâ€™s amazing how many of Mac OS Xâ€™s key features were actually ported over from the previous OS.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really, considering Apple paid $400 million for it. What is amazing is how many features from NeXTSTEP and Mac OS is ported into Windows and Microsoft paid nothing for it.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28549</link>
		<dc:creator>CM Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28549</guid>
		<description>@Tim, The entire cocoa frameworks were NeXT derived (that's why they begin with NSâ€¦), so yeah, they had it first. Of course, there are some things NeXT had that OSX still lacks, like NXHosting (think steroid enhanced VNC, but MUCH faster). As a matter of fact, I still don't quite understand why NXHosting isn't incorporated into Apple Remote Desktop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim, The entire cocoa frameworks were NeXT derived (that&#8217;s why they begin with NSâ€¦), so yeah, they had it first. Of course, there are some things NeXT had that OSX still lacks, like NXHosting (think steroid enhanced VNC, but MUCH faster). As a matter of fact, I still don&#8217;t quite understand why NXHosting isn&#8217;t incorporated into Apple Remote Desktop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28518</guid>
		<description>hehehe.... Nice one. :)

It's amazing how many of Mac OS X's key features were actually ported over from the previous OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehehe&#8230;. Nice one. :)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many of Mac OS X&#8217;s key features were actually ported over from the previous OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/steve-jobs-shows-off-nextstep-nextmail/#comment-28511</guid>
		<description>Between Mail.app, bundles, digital webster, Dock, quad-fat binaries, and display postscript, Mac OS X is like a â€œslightly tarted up Nextstepâ€. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Mail.app, bundles, digital webster, Dock, quad-fat binaries, and display postscript, Mac OS X is like a â€œslightly tarted up Nextstepâ€. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.277 seconds -->
