<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EagleFiler: tag-smart, open-format PIM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-38006</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-38006</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I just tried EagleFiler. I put 2 files in it, a web page and a 28k jpg. My library folder is only 328k in size.

I opened Activity Monitor to compare it to Yojimbo, and am shocked with what I've seen:

EagleFiler - Real Memory: 73.73mb   Virtual Memory: 423.70mb
Yojimbo - Real Memory: 22.36mb   Virtual Memory: 461.48mb
Yojimbo Helper - Real Memory: 8.44mb   Virtual Memory: 360.84mb

In my opinion, all three are using way too much memory. But, to be fair, I have been running Yojimbo consistently for months now and put a lot of data in to it. Why the hell does Eagle Filer need so much memory after running for 2 minutes with 2 files?

I was planning to run both side by side as I prefer the ability to store and encrypt login details with Yojimbo, but I think I'll stick with Yojimbo for now because it just seems an unncessary drain on my system to run both.

Can anyone tell me how EagleFiler's memory usage is after some time and use?

Thanks,

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I just tried EagleFiler. I put 2 files in it, a web page and a 28k jpg. My library folder is only 328k in size.</p>
<p>I opened Activity Monitor to compare it to Yojimbo, and am shocked with what I&#8217;ve seen:</p>
<p>EagleFiler - Real Memory: 73.73mb   Virtual Memory: 423.70mb<br />
Yojimbo - Real Memory: 22.36mb   Virtual Memory: 461.48mb<br />
Yojimbo Helper - Real Memory: 8.44mb   Virtual Memory: 360.84mb</p>
<p>In my opinion, all three are using way too much memory. But, to be fair, I have been running Yojimbo consistently for months now and put a lot of data in to it. Why the hell does Eagle Filer need so much memory after running for 2 minutes with 2 files?</p>
<p>I was planning to run both side by side as I prefer the ability to store and encrypt login details with Yojimbo, but I think I&#8217;ll stick with Yojimbo for now because it just seems an unncessary drain on my system to run both.</p>
<p>Can anyone tell me how EagleFiler&#8217;s memory usage is after some time and use?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayjay</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-29081</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-29081</guid>
		<description>Yojimbo's data is in your Library &#62; Application Support &#62; Yojimbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yojimbo&#8217;s data is in your Library &gt; Application Support &gt; Yojimbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matonmacs</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28577</link>
		<dc:creator>matonmacs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28577</guid>
		<description>Argh! I just switch from then Stickybrain to Yojimbo, now Eagle Filer comes along. I like the fact that it stores things within the regular file structure instead of a proprietary database a la SOHO Notes or the weird hidden Yojimbo library (at least I don't know where it is). On the other hand, how many of these things do we need?!

What I'd like to know is what the future development plans for these programs are. If Eagle Filer will have the robust Applescript support that Yojimbo lacks maybe that would be enough to get me to switch. I agree with the above poster, however, I thinking that a cross-grade discount would be nice.

It'd be nice if somebody would do a comprehensive comparative review.

Oh and EF needs a better icon (not that Yojimbo's is any good either)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh! I just switch from then Stickybrain to Yojimbo, now Eagle Filer comes along. I like the fact that it stores things within the regular file structure instead of a proprietary database a la SOHO Notes or the weird hidden Yojimbo library (at least I don&#8217;t know where it is). On the other hand, how many of these things do we need?!</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like to know is what the future development plans for these programs are. If Eagle Filer will have the robust Applescript support that Yojimbo lacks maybe that would be enough to get me to switch. I agree with the above poster, however, I thinking that a cross-grade discount would be nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be nice if somebody would do a comprehensive comparative review.</p>
<p>Oh and EF needs a better icon (not that Yojimbo&#8217;s is any good either)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28553</link>
		<dc:creator>CM Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28553</guid>
		<description>I've always been a fan of MacJournal. Back when it was freeware, I thought it was amazing, however the one thing I wanted, nested journals, didn't come until after it was purchased by Mariner Software, and turned into a payware application. Eventually, I caved in, and purchased it, and couldn't be happier.

It does everything I want... a system-wide Service to add to MacJournal, multiple, nested journals, multiple pages per journal, tagging, smart groups, posting to weblogs, etc.

To be honest, I don't find the "mail.app-like" 3 pane approach to work for a scrap management tool, so this works best for me.

Interestingly enough, I found MacJournal while trying to find a replacement for the Classic "Notepad" application, and I've never looked back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been a fan of MacJournal. Back when it was freeware, I thought it was amazing, however the one thing I wanted, nested journals, didn&#8217;t come until after it was purchased by Mariner Software, and turned into a payware application. Eventually, I caved in, and purchased it, and couldn&#8217;t be happier.</p>
<p>It does everything I want&#8230; a system-wide Service to add to MacJournal, multiple, nested journals, multiple pages per journal, tagging, smart groups, posting to weblogs, etc.</p>
<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t find the &#8220;mail.app-like&#8221; 3 pane approach to work for a scrap management tool, so this works best for me.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, I found MacJournal while trying to find a replacement for the Classic &#8220;Notepad&#8221; application, and I&#8217;ve never looked back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Perreault</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28545</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Perreault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28545</guid>
		<description>I have been switching between StickyBrain (SOHONotes) and Yojimbo as my primary file manager for months. Neither of them completely capable of my needs. Yesterday  I installed EagleFiler and imported my saved files from SOHO and Yojimbo, spent some time tagging the files and I have to say EagleFiler performs flawlessly. The ability to tag the files with Keywords is necessary for a great File Manager. Both StickyBrain and Yojimbo force the user to use categories for filing which is very limiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been switching between StickyBrain (SOHONotes) and Yojimbo as my primary file manager for months. Neither of them completely capable of my needs. Yesterday  I installed EagleFiler and imported my saved files from SOHO and Yojimbo, spent some time tagging the files and I have to say EagleFiler performs flawlessly. The ability to tag the files with Keywords is necessary for a great File Manager. Both StickyBrain and Yojimbo force the user to use categories for filing which is very limiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Perreault</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28544</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Perreault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28544</guid>
		<description>I have been switching between StickyBrain (SOHONotes) and Yojimbo as my primary file manager for months. Neither of them completely capable of my needs. Yesterday  I installed EagleFiler and imported my saved files from SOHO and Yojimbo, spent some time tagging the files and I have to say EagleFiler performs flawlessly. The ability to tag the files with Keywords is necessary for a great File Manager. Both StickyBrain and Yojimbo force the user to use categories for filing which is very limiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been switching between StickyBrain (SOHONotes) and Yojimbo as my primary file manager for months. Neither of them completely capable of my needs. Yesterday  I installed EagleFiler and imported my saved files from SOHO and Yojimbo, spent some time tagging the files and I have to say EagleFiler performs flawlessly. The ability to tag the files with Keywords is necessary for a great File Manager. Both StickyBrain and Yojimbo force the user to use categories for filing which is very limiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28541</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28541</guid>
		<description>No worries, Tim! You're right that "there is a significant difference between a searchable comment and a tag"; I just want to suggest that some of what people want from tags can be accomplished via the searchable comments of Yojimbo. That's how I use the app, anyway. When (if?) Yojimbo gets user-defined smart folders, it will be a lot closer to having the full functionality of tags, though it will probably never match EagleFiler in this regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries, Tim! You&#8217;re right that &#8220;there is a significant difference between a searchable comment and a tag&#8221;; I just want to suggest that some of what people want from tags can be accomplished via the searchable comments of Yojimbo. That&#8217;s how I use the app, anyway. When (if?) Yojimbo gets user-defined smart folders, it will be a lot closer to having the full functionality of tags, though it will probably never match EagleFiler in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28538</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28538</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Alan, I'm a cantankerous dipstick sometimes. :(

If I had a more functional turn of mind, I would probably see your point entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Alan, I&#8217;m a cantankerous dipstick sometimes. :(</p>
<p>If I had a more functional turn of mind, I would probably see your point entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28530</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28530</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.... I think that there is a significant difference between a searchable comment and a tag, enough to make them different things.

But semantic slanging-matches are best avoided. Let's agree to disagree :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. I think that there is a significant difference between a searchable comment and a tag, enough to make them different things.</p>
<p>But semantic slanging-matches are best avoided. Let&#8217;s agree to disagree :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28529</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/16/eaglefiler-tag-smart-open-format-pim/#comment-28529</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that EagleFiler has a better, richer &lt;em&gt;implementation&lt;/em&gt; of tagging. But my original point is correct: "Itâ€™s not quite true that Yojimbo doesnâ€™t support tags."There's a big difference between having "unpolished" tagging and no tagging at all. No disrespect to EagleFiler, which looks cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that EagleFiler has a better, richer <em>implementation</em> of tagging. But my original point is correct: &#8220;Itâ€™s not quite true that Yojimbo doesnâ€™t support tags.&#8221;There&#8217;s a big difference between having &#8220;unpolished&#8221; tagging and no tagging at all. No disrespect to EagleFiler, which looks cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->
