<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dotting the &#8220;i&#8221; in iCal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/comment-page-1/#comment-28963</link>
		<dc:creator>N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/#comment-28963</guid>
		<description>Well, since iCal was originally written by the Apple France group (IIRC), I give them a little slack on English grammar. And like you said, it&#039;s not really a bug as much as a niggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since iCal was originally written by the Apple France group (IIRC), I give them a little slack on English grammar. And like you said, it&#8217;s not really a bug as much as a niggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin White</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/comment-page-1/#comment-28921</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/#comment-28921</guid>
		<description>I suffered this issue myself when I printed my wedding invitations. Not thinking about the number of guests most people will bring (one) I included the line &quot;I&#039;m bringing ___ people.&quot; I got a number of them back with the word &quot;people&quot; crossed out and &quot;person&quot; written in. 

I&#039;m sure none of my invitees were offended at my improper grammar, but the issue certainly did burn my perfectionist britches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suffered this issue myself when I printed my wedding invitations. Not thinking about the number of guests most people will bring (one) I included the line &#8220;I&#8217;m bringing ___ people.&#8221; I got a number of them back with the word &#8220;people&#8221; crossed out and &#8220;person&#8221; written in. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure none of my invitees were offended at my improper grammar, but the issue certainly did burn my perfectionist britches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Damm</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/comment-page-1/#comment-27637</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Damm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/#comment-27637</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s localization guys have worked around this in the  German version of Mail.app: There it says &quot;Stunde(n)&quot;, i.e. &quot;hour(s)&quot;.

But that&#039;s probably even a worse solution -- the wrong &quot;hours&quot; looks like &quot;somebody missed this one&quot;, but &quot;hour(s)&quot; looks like &quot;somebody was too lazy to do this right&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s localization guys have worked around this in the  German version of Mail.app: There it says &#8220;Stunde(n)&#8221;, i.e. &#8220;hour(s)&#8221;.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s probably even a worse solution &#8212; the wrong &#8220;hours&#8221; looks like &#8220;somebody missed this one&#8221;, but &#8220;hour(s)&#8221; looks like &#8220;somebody was too lazy to do this right&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/comment-page-1/#comment-27581</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/#comment-27581</guid>
		<description>I noticed this..  &#039;issue&#039;  back with my first use of iCal 1.0.  

Frankly I&#039;m not surprised that Apple hasn&#039;t fixed it.   While Apple may be big on polish - that typically means &quot;appearance&quot; and &quot;visual&quot; behaviours.   I.e. the text content of things isn&#039;t the first thing they notice.  It&#039;s the pretty graphics and buttons that they are looking at. 

And frankly I don&#039;t blame them.  I  saw this happen - and the reverse on occasion though I can&#039;t remember specifics or provide examples.   I saw it and said to myself &quot;oh.. look at that&quot; and promptly forgot about it.  I mean.. who cares.  

We are all smart enough to know what it means and while sure,  it may be just laziness in not coding around it, it&#039;s also only an issue for 1 possible choice for each of the categories of times - minutes, hours, days, before and after. 

In fact, statistically, it is probably even less common in the &#039;minutes&#039; category.  1 minutes doesn&#039;t give you a lot of time to get ready for something.   In the same way it&#039;s probably not important that you can&#039;t put in &quot;100000&quot; hours before something as an alarm.  (If you do it converts it to &quot;32767&quot; )  It looks like the Max is 99999.   However I&#039;m sure the case doesn&#039;t come up very often.  So why fix it.

Really, I&#039;m not sure it is worth the amount of extra code it would take to fix it - I&#039;m a fan of &quot;small&quot; programs and while I don&#039;t expect something like iCal to be tiny - every little bit smaller it can be is that much faster that it can run. 

I think the greater challenge for date related applications is getting the &quot;st&quot;, &quot;nd&quot;
, &quot;rd&quot;, and various &quot;th&quot; extensions right for dates - though the easiest way around that is to not use date formats that use it.   While I can look past it as well - I find it much more annoying to read &quot;Tuesday October 3th&quot; than &quot;1 hours before&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this..  &#8216;issue&#8217;  back with my first use of iCal 1.0.  </p>
<p>Frankly I&#8217;m not surprised that Apple hasn&#8217;t fixed it.   While Apple may be big on polish &#8211; that typically means &#8220;appearance&#8221; and &#8220;visual&#8221; behaviours.   I.e. the text content of things isn&#8217;t the first thing they notice.  It&#8217;s the pretty graphics and buttons that they are looking at. </p>
<p>And frankly I don&#8217;t blame them.  I  saw this happen &#8211; and the reverse on occasion though I can&#8217;t remember specifics or provide examples.   I saw it and said to myself &#8220;oh.. look at that&#8221; and promptly forgot about it.  I mean.. who cares.  </p>
<p>We are all smart enough to know what it means and while sure,  it may be just laziness in not coding around it, it&#8217;s also only an issue for 1 possible choice for each of the categories of times &#8211; minutes, hours, days, before and after. </p>
<p>In fact, statistically, it is probably even less common in the &#8216;minutes&#8217; category.  1 minutes doesn&#8217;t give you a lot of time to get ready for something.   In the same way it&#8217;s probably not important that you can&#8217;t put in &#8220;100000&#8243; hours before something as an alarm.  (If you do it converts it to &#8220;32767&#8243; )  It looks like the Max is 99999.   However I&#8217;m sure the case doesn&#8217;t come up very often.  So why fix it.</p>
<p>Really, I&#8217;m not sure it is worth the amount of extra code it would take to fix it &#8211; I&#8217;m a fan of &#8220;small&#8221; programs and while I don&#8217;t expect something like iCal to be tiny &#8211; every little bit smaller it can be is that much faster that it can run. </p>
<p>I think the greater challenge for date related applications is getting the &#8220;st&#8221;, &#8220;nd&#8221;<br />
, &#8220;rd&#8221;, and various &#8220;th&#8221; extensions right for dates &#8211; though the easiest way around that is to not use date formats that use it.   While I can look past it as well &#8211; I find it much more annoying to read &#8220;Tuesday October 3th&#8221; than &#8220;1 hours before&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/comment-page-1/#comment-27555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/10/12/dotting-the-i-in-ical/#comment-27555</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ironic, I noticed this when I started using iCal about 2 months ago... said to myself &quot;ha, 1 hours - sounds like the way my 3-year-old talks&quot; but I didn&#039;t think anything of it as it&#039;s a computer, it can&#039;t be all-knowing.

Good to see I am not the only one that sees little things that my wife referrs to as an &quot;annoying quality&quot; of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic, I noticed this when I started using iCal about 2 months ago&#8230; said to myself &#8220;ha, 1 hours &#8211; sounds like the way my 3-year-old talks&#8221; but I didn&#8217;t think anything of it as it&#8217;s a computer, it can&#8217;t be all-knowing.</p>
<p>Good to see I am not the only one that sees little things that my wife referrs to as an &#8220;annoying quality&#8221; of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

