Comments on: MailTags 1.2.2: Mouseless tagging and more

By: Hawk Wings » Blog Archive » MailTags Public Beta 3.0 released

Hawk Wings » Blog Archive » MailTags Public Beta 3.0 released — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:21:03 +0000

[...] Scott Morrison has released a third public beta of MailTags 2.0, the next supercharged version of his outstanding plugin for Mail.app (Read more about this plugin which has totally revolutionised the way I use Mail in earlier reviews of MailTags 1.2 and MailTags 1.2.2). [...]

By: Tim

Tim — Sat, 08 Jul 2006 01:21:56 +0000

That’s probably an oversight on my part. I’ve never had stabilty problems with MailTags, so I just didn’t notice. Sorry about that.

By: Scott Morrison

Scott Morrison — Sat, 08 Jul 2006 01:19:38 +0000

Actually Tom, the stability fix was #1 on the change log —

Glad you like the new features :)

By: Tom Moore

Tom Moore — Sat, 08 Jul 2006 01:13:52 +0000

No one mentioned that 1.2.2 appears to fix the problem that 1.2.1 had with hanging Mail, usually just after trying to send a message. I’ve been using this one a couple of days on two computers (one Intel, one G4), and no hangs so far…

The new features are GREAT. I especially like being able to change subject lines.

Tom Moore

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:20:56 +0000

Excellent :)

By: Brady J. Frey

Brady J. Frey — Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:38:49 +0000

maybe I will then:)…

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:03:49 +0000

You could always sign up for the public beta? :)

By: Brady J. Frey

Brady J. Frey — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:07:31 +0000

I look forward to enjoying these features when you support IMAP soon… as I imagine, much of the other people in my company, keep up the good work:)

By: hugo ahlberg

hugo ahlberg — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:55:54 +0000

@Scott Morrison – I just sent an email to an adress I found in the FAQ.. I’m afraid I dont have much more details though.

By: Scott Morrison

Scott Morrison — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:53:48 +0000

@jeff
Its not that it can’t but it probably won’t do much for you — the tags are indexed in the emlx file in anycase — I could add this as a feature but the less playing about the actual message I have to do the better. If you want to discuss further, lets meet up at forums.indev.ca