<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backsliding blogger dumps Mail.app for Gmail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mushu</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-74318</link>
		<dc:creator>mushu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-74318</guid>
		<description>these google conspiracy theorists are smoking too much crack,

gmail is one of the best (barnone), 

re: privacy

its just as true that any ISP can snoop your email as google, you are no more safer with an ISP then you are with google so arguing that gmail is unsafe well its just not true,

i think its funny these people believe they are safer on an ISP ha ha, these same people probablly think their cellphone text messages and conversations are more secure with one company vs another
geez people wake up,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these google conspiracy theorists are smoking too much crack,</p>
<p>gmail is one of the best (barnone), </p>
<p>re: privacy</p>
<p>its just as true that any ISP can snoop your email as google, you are no more safer with an ISP then you are with google so arguing that gmail is unsafe well its just not true,</p>
<p>i think its funny these people believe they are safer on an ISP ha ha, these same people probablly think their cellphone text messages and conversations are more secure with one company vs another<br />
geez people wake up,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjk</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>sjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I find the praise for GMailâ€™s UI a little mystifying. It has an intriguing concept, but its execution is flawed in so many ways.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Gmail is the mainstream prototype for "folderless" mail management, a cool concept unfortunately crippled by limited tag support and other UI weaknesses (some mentioned in comments here).

I'd like to see explicit examples of people efficiently using it to manage high volumes of mail with a broad content diversity over long periods of time.  It certainly doesn't fit that role based on my own experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I find the praise for GMailâ€™s UI a little mystifying. It has an intriguing concept, but its execution is flawed in so many ways.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gmail is the mainstream prototype for &#8220;folderless&#8221; mail management, a cool concept unfortunately crippled by limited tag support and other UI weaknesses (some mentioned in comments here).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see explicit examples of people efficiently using it to manage high volumes of mail with a broad content diversity over long periods of time.  It certainly doesn&#8217;t fit that role based on my own experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Warne</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Warne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6432</guid>
		<description>GMail is great. If only they allowed you to toggle between conversation and chronological mode, I'd use it as my primary client too. Sometimes you just need to see the flow of incoming messages. The conversation mode requires far too much thinking, because even though you can see that a conversation has floated to the top of the list, the way Google shows the list of names attached to the conversation doesn't make obvious who the latest message is from. Besides, even if it is somehow  detectable, it's clearly not obvious as I haven't been able to figure it out (nor do I want to have to figure it out when glancing at a list of email.)

Also, I recently filled up my Gmail account, and it is SERIOUSLY difficult to clear out email to make space. With (I presume) many Gmail accounts now reaching "maturity", Google urgently needs to provide an option to drop old email off the back of the database to make room for new stuff. Or provide much more robust searching and mass deletion options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMail is great. If only they allowed you to toggle between conversation and chronological mode, I&#8217;d use it as my primary client too. Sometimes you just need to see the flow of incoming messages. The conversation mode requires far too much thinking, because even though you can see that a conversation has floated to the top of the list, the way Google shows the list of names attached to the conversation doesn&#8217;t make obvious who the latest message is from. Besides, even if it is somehow  detectable, it&#8217;s clearly not obvious as I haven&#8217;t been able to figure it out (nor do I want to have to figure it out when glancing at a list of email.)</p>
<p>Also, I recently filled up my Gmail account, and it is SERIOUSLY difficult to clear out email to make space. With (I presume) many Gmail accounts now reaching &#8220;maturity&#8221;, Google urgently needs to provide an option to drop old email off the back of the database to make room for new stuff. Or provide much more robust searching and mass deletion options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6425</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6425</guid>
		<description>Having changed academic institutions a few times recently gmail is useful to me as a stable address with plenty of space &#38; free POP. At work I use the gmail interface &#38; at home I download to Mail. Mail is a blessed relief after the gmail interface, which I now detest. The trouble is you /have/ view it organized in 'conversations', which undermines the simple to-do functionality of the inbox. After reading a non-urgent email it might sit for a while before I reply; in Mail I can see it, in gmail it'll get lost somewhere in a conversation. And an entire conversation gets promoted to the top of the list when a new message comes in. So the result is I no longer have a simple way to see what I need to reply to, organized by the recency of the message.  I'm finding that when I'm using Mail important messages 'pop out' that I've overlooked or forgotten about in gmail.

The privacy issue bothers me more &#38; more, seeing the direction Google is heading, their sheer scale, and the possibility of getting caught by mistake in a US gov electronic dragnet. No chance I'll be using gdrive, and I'll abandon gmail when I get a long-term institutional address. In 2020 Google will be trying to insert text messages into my dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having changed academic institutions a few times recently gmail is useful to me as a stable address with plenty of space &amp; free POP. At work I use the gmail interface &amp; at home I download to Mail. Mail is a blessed relief after the gmail interface, which I now detest. The trouble is you /have/ view it organized in &#8216;conversations&#8217;, which undermines the simple to-do functionality of the inbox. After reading a non-urgent email it might sit for a while before I reply; in Mail I can see it, in gmail it&#8217;ll get lost somewhere in a conversation. And an entire conversation gets promoted to the top of the list when a new message comes in. So the result is I no longer have a simple way to see what I need to reply to, organized by the recency of the message.  I&#8217;m finding that when I&#8217;m using Mail important messages &#8216;pop out&#8217; that I&#8217;ve overlooked or forgotten about in gmail.</p>
<p>The privacy issue bothers me more &amp; more, seeing the direction Google is heading, their sheer scale, and the possibility of getting caught by mistake in a US gov electronic dragnet. No chance I&#8217;ll be using gdrive, and I&#8217;ll abandon gmail when I get a long-term institutional address. In 2020 Google will be trying to insert text messages into my dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6400</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6400</guid>
		<description>in response to jonas' query:
it's not that they *can*, it's that they *do*. Each email in gmail IS processed for keywords, to macth against advertising, as well as make calendar recommendations etc.

One can argue that google isn't doing anything "bad" with your email, and that the advertising is an acceptable cost to most for a pretty good service.  

But being wary of a corporation who's bottom line is their bottom line and the wallets of their investors, is not paranoia, it is merely awareness.

We all have the right to make these decisions (to use or not); but we also have the responsibility to be informed and vigilant.

cost + risk + value. weigh them for your own particular situation and need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in response to jonas&#8217; query:<br />
it&#8217;s not that they *can*, it&#8217;s that they *do*. Each email in gmail IS processed for keywords, to macth against advertising, as well as make calendar recommendations etc.</p>
<p>One can argue that google isn&#8217;t doing anything &#8220;bad&#8221; with your email, and that the advertising is an acceptable cost to most for a pretty good service.  </p>
<p>But being wary of a corporation who&#8217;s bottom line is their bottom line and the wallets of their investors, is not paranoia, it is merely awareness.</p>
<p>We all have the right to make these decisions (to use or not); but we also have the responsibility to be informed and vigilant.</p>
<p>cost + risk + value. weigh them for your own particular situation and need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6353</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6353</guid>
		<description>The reality is all ISPs who operate email servers maintain complete backups of email traffic.  The real risk of privacy invasion is not at the corporate policy level -- it's at the level of individual rogue employees/sysadmins who may decide to supplement their incomes by engaging in unethical behavior with customer data.  I don't see any difference between Google and other ISPs in this regard.  Indeed, Google seems to attract a higher calibre of individual employee and thus may be less likely to have employees prone to abusing the database, or, because of their size, may maintain better data auditing.

If privacy is a genuine concern for a person, as opposed to a knee-jerk stance against a single company, the only solution is to operate your own email server.  Even then, we've seen that three quarters of Internet backbone providers in the US are willing to allow traffic monitoring by government officials without a court order, so encryption is worth considering for truly sensitive information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality is all ISPs who operate email servers maintain complete backups of email traffic.  The real risk of privacy invasion is not at the corporate policy level &#8212; it&#8217;s at the level of individual rogue employees/sysadmins who may decide to supplement their incomes by engaging in unethical behavior with customer data.  I don&#8217;t see any difference between Google and other ISPs in this regard.  Indeed, Google seems to attract a higher calibre of individual employee and thus may be less likely to have employees prone to abusing the database, or, because of their size, may maintain better data auditing.</p>
<p>If privacy is a genuine concern for a person, as opposed to a knee-jerk stance against a single company, the only solution is to operate your own email server.  Even then, we&#8217;ve seen that three quarters of Internet backbone providers in the US are willing to allow traffic monitoring by government officials without a court order, so encryption is worth considering for truly sensitive information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashah2</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6349</link>
		<dc:creator>ashah2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6349</guid>
		<description>I do apologize for breaking back into privacy at the end of my previous post.  I was trying to stay on topic. :)  I was merely pointing out that the government just recently told ISPs that they will have to start saving all correspondence (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/01/feds_need_ip_data/).

[OT] The crux of my argument will always boil down to cost.  Only Google has the infrastructure to harness your data as a result you don't know what they are doing with it.  Everyone else has no real monetary gain to retain or even try to sift through your information.

I didn't say Mail.app's threading was better than Gmail's threading.  Gmail's threading is pretty darn good, but like spam filtering it doesn't work all the time.  Unlike spam fiitering, I cannot fix the mistake.  This inability to correct mistakes thwarts Gmail's superior threading, and that is intolerable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do apologize for breaking back into privacy at the end of my previous post.  I was trying to stay on topic. :)  I was merely pointing out that the government just recently told ISPs that they will have to start saving all correspondence (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/01/feds_need_ip_data/).</p>
<p>[OT] The crux of my argument will always boil down to cost.  Only Google has the infrastructure to harness your data as a result you don&#8217;t know what they are doing with it.  Everyone else has no real monetary gain to retain or even try to sift through your information.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say Mail.app&#8217;s threading was better than Gmail&#8217;s threading.  Gmail&#8217;s threading is pretty darn good, but like spam filtering it doesn&#8217;t work all the time.  Unlike spam fiitering, I cannot fix the mistake.  This inability to correct mistakes thwarts Gmail&#8217;s superior threading, and that is intolerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artMonster</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6348</link>
		<dc:creator>artMonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6348</guid>
		<description>bobinnv, I think the fundamental difference is that (in theory) Charter Communications does not read and retain a separate database of what you write.  Google does. That is what you allow them to do. As long as everybody knows the rules, no problem. The rest is just UI preferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bobinnv, I think the fundamental difference is that (in theory) Charter Communications does not read and retain a separate database of what you write.  Google does. That is what you allow them to do. As long as everybody knows the rules, no problem. The rest is just UI preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobinnv</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6337</link>
		<dc:creator>bobinnv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6337</guid>
		<description>ashah2 -

I can certainly understand (but not agree with) your UI complaints. To each his own - for instance, I think Gmail handles threading way better than Mail does. This thread started because someone likes Gmail more than Mail, and based on just the UI, that is certainly a debatable point.

But I still don't understand the "privacy concerns". I'm not sure why you don't think other ISPs do not retain your 'emai information' - how does Charter Communications allow me to access my email on the web without retaining anything? Don't they do backups? Don't they scan every incoming email for their spam filters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ashah2 -</p>
<p>I can certainly understand (but not agree with) your UI complaints. To each his own - for instance, I think Gmail handles threading way better than Mail does. This thread started because someone likes Gmail more than Mail, and based on just the UI, that is certainly a debatable point.</p>
<p>But I still don&#8217;t understand the &#8220;privacy concerns&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure why you don&#8217;t think other ISPs do not retain your &#8216;emai information&#8217; - how does Charter Communications allow me to access my email on the web without retaining anything? Don&#8217;t they do backups? Don&#8217;t they scan every incoming email for their spam filters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashah2</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator>ashah2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/06/13/backsliding-blogger-dumps-mailapp-for-gmail/#comment-6329</guid>
		<description>Let's take privacy out the Gmail vs. Local mail client for a second. (I dumped Gmail precisely because of the privacy concerns.  I run my own email via a third party ISP.)

Problems with gmail:
1- They want my contacts.  This is not a privacy concern, those bozos want me to spend my time uploading them.  Forget it.  Gmail does not sync with my phone.

2- I need an internet connection.  Slow internet connections are wose than not having an internet connection with things like gmail.

3- Logging into Gmail logs me into everything else that google uses. For example,  I don't want customized news just because I logged into gmail.

4- 100 threads per page.  Sorry, I need more.

5- Cannot upload old emails.  I have email dating back to 1996.  Local mail clients are capable of importing those emails that I want. I used to keep them in folders separated by month.  Then I collapsed them into years.  Then I collapsed them into two archives of sent and recieved.

6- Bad threading.  Just because I hijacked a thread to pull off some emails from the message does not mean that it is part of that email thread.  A previous poster covered this better. No threading is better than bad threading.

Gmail is not the cat's meow.  Add privacy concerns to the mix and its the worst.  Other ISPs do not retain your email information.  Up till now it wasn't worth it.  With the FCC saying that they have to in case of litigation you know that free email is on its last legs.

Excuse my speeling, I am using windows which has no support for spell checking in FireFox (don't tell me about any plugins please, I like saying this).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s take privacy out the Gmail vs. Local mail client for a second. (I dumped Gmail precisely because of the privacy concerns.  I run my own email via a third party ISP.)</p>
<p>Problems with gmail:<br />
1- They want my contacts.  This is not a privacy concern, those bozos want me to spend my time uploading them.  Forget it.  Gmail does not sync with my phone.</p>
<p>2- I need an internet connection.  Slow internet connections are wose than not having an internet connection with things like gmail.</p>
<p>3- Logging into Gmail logs me into everything else that google uses. For example,  I don&#8217;t want customized news just because I logged into gmail.</p>
<p>4- 100 threads per page.  Sorry, I need more.</p>
<p>5- Cannot upload old emails.  I have email dating back to 1996.  Local mail clients are capable of importing those emails that I want. I used to keep them in folders separated by month.  Then I collapsed them into years.  Then I collapsed them into two archives of sent and recieved.</p>
<p>6- Bad threading.  Just because I hijacked a thread to pull off some emails from the message does not mean that it is part of that email thread.  A previous poster covered this better. No threading is better than bad threading.</p>
<p>Gmail is not the cat&#8217;s meow.  Add privacy concerns to the mix and its the worst.  Other ISPs do not retain your email information.  Up till now it wasn&#8217;t worth it.  With the FCC saying that they have to in case of litigation you know that free email is on its last legs.</p>
<p>Excuse my speeling, I am using windows which has no support for spell checking in FireFox (don&#8217;t tell me about any plugins please, I like saying this).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.477 seconds -->
