Regards
Nitin Jagga

Please check the link that i’ve given you in the previous comments. First things first, I’ve made all the necessary corrections you desired. Secondlyl, I stay in a country called India, where Cyber Laws exclude blogging.

But since I don’t want any legal mesh hanging around my neck, Please check the link I provided, or I am providing it here again for your convinience.

http://jagganitin.blogspot.com/2006/02/fuss-about-gmail-and-privacy-nine.html

Regards
Nitin Jagga

That being said, i still don’t think you’ve done enough — you’ve blatantly copied, word for word, another article and posted it as your own. Only in the comments do you note, allll the waaaaay in the bottooom, that it’s a copy.

Do you understand the harshness of this? Since you copied it and pasted it it, it’s written in first person — obviously people are going to assume that you wrote it then — which must be your intention. If you wanted to just paste it in for your readers, why not link to the article and stating how you read this unique article go here (enter link). Or, if you wanted to put it on there for your readers, at the very top you should note that it’s copied word for word from the article and link to it — at the top, not way at the bottom.

You even clearly wrote “Thanks for your consideration, but, my blog is targeted towards a limited set of people and though the stuff is copied exactly without being doctored from the same site of O?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢ Reily but that?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢s for the information of the people (who are very limited in numbers) for my blog only. ” You have a limited audience — so your attempt to post this without referencing the original article, in first person — is an obvious attempt to make it sound like it came from you.

So you want to fix this without me publishing it across the net? Take it down, or put at the top that it’s taken from XX article and that you are copying and pasting it here for your readers, but that you didn’t write it. At the top, not the bottom.

Or better yet, take the whole thing down, and put a link to the original article, or the combo I suggested above.

Your method of posting a little at the bottom and running away does not show transparency… in any way shape or form.

Also to note, all of O’Reilly’s documentation is copyrighted, which puts you in legal violation if it’s written in first person without proper listing of your intentions prior to the articles readers knowledge. That comes with years of being a writer, so you know.

So are you going to reference at the top with a link, just put a link, or do I get to email O’Reilly and cross publish this?

Please check the following link out……

http://jagganitin.blogspot.com/2006/02/fuss-about-gmail-and-privacy-nine.html

If you still want some modifications, please let me know, and if justifiable, will be done.

Regards
Nitin Jagga

…and I see you put your reference in the quotes, not at the head of the document — another sneaky thing to do. It doesn’t matter in the end, you can’t write your own, you won’t go far.

Thanks and Regards
Nitin Jagga

1) Try to have at least the slightest idea about how the Internet and the WWW in general and welogs in particular work.

2) Give credit where credit is due, link to the original article, only quote a paragraph or two (use the blockquote-tag for that). I’m sure even your limited target audience will be able to follow a link.

3) If you’re really only interested in reaching a (very) limited audience, consider an e-mail newsletter instead of a weblog. I know it’s quite old-school but it works!

4) I still don’t see you giving any credit to Mr. O’Reilly on your blog.

5) See 1).

Plagiarism

Thanks and Regards
Nitin Jagga