<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of the day: Endianness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/</link>
	<description>Tips and add-ons to make Apple Mail / Mail.app even better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>I started to make a concise summary here, but it quickly got too large for &quot;comment courtesy&quot; :) 

http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/92/easy-endian-ness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started to make a concise summary here, but it quickly got too large for &#8220;comment courtesy&#8221; :) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/92/easy-endian-ness" rel="nofollow">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/92/easy-endian-ness</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Sweater Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Easy Endian-ness</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Sweater Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Easy Endian-ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Gaden points out on his Hawk Wings blog that the term &#8220;endian-ness&#8221; has come into wide use in the Mac community lately, and it&#8217;s leaking out of the labs and into common conversation with customers. He astutely observes that many people haven&#8217;t got the foggiest idea what it means. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Gaden points out on his Hawk Wings blog that the term &#8220;endian-ness&#8221; has come into wide use in the Mac community lately, and it&#8217;s leaking out of the labs and into common conversation with customers. He astutely observes that many people haven&#8217;t got the foggiest idea what it means. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArAgost</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>ArAgost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Ed, you&#039;re basically right: one says 000001, the other says 100000, they mean the same thing. This is basically a cosmetic difference (though when you read bits and bytes you have to deal with it). The real differences in the two processors are far more complex, and understanding them requires a little specific knowledge. For those interested in the matter, I suggest reading &quot;Structured Computer Architecture&quot; by Andrew S. Tannenbaum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, you&#8217;re basically right: one says 000001, the other says 100000, they mean the same thing. This is basically a cosmetic difference (though when you read bits and bytes you have to deal with it). The real differences in the two processors are far more complex, and understanding them requires a little specific knowledge. For those interested in the matter, I suggest reading &#8220;Structured Computer Architecture&#8221; by Andrew S. Tannenbaum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chucky</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about AppleScript.

It&#039;s about the difference between how Intel and PowerPC processors deal with the order of bytes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about AppleScript.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about the difference between how Intel and PowerPC processors deal with the order of bytes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rayne</title>
		<link>http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawkwings.net/2006/01/26/word-of-the-day-endianness/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>From what I gather it&#039;s basically what makes the Intel and PowerPC processors different. I can&#039;t remember which way round it us but it&#039;s a fundamental difference.

I think the byte order thing refers to how binary numbers are stored so &#039;1&#039; would be 0000001 in one endianness and 10000000 in the other. Or I may be completely wrong.

So anything that reads bits and bytes depends upon the order the bytes are written in.

(Great blog, by the way.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I gather it&#8217;s basically what makes the Intel and PowerPC processors different. I can&#8217;t remember which way round it us but it&#8217;s a fundamental difference.</p>
<p>I think the byte order thing refers to how binary numbers are stored so &#8217;1&#8242; would be 0000001 in one endianness and 10000000 in the other. Or I may be completely wrong.</p>
<p>So anything that reads bits and bytes depends upon the order the bytes are written in.</p>
<p>(Great blog, by the way.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

